期刊文献+

神经源性膀胱患者间歇导尿困难评估量表的汉化及信效度检验

Translation and Validation of the Chinese Version of the Intermittent Catheterization Difficulty Questionnaire for Neurogenic Bladder Patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对间歇性导尿困难评估量表(Intermittent Catheterization Difficulty Questionnaire,ICDQ)进行汉化,并检验其信效度。方法:通过翻译、回译和本土化形成中文版的ICDQ,并对武汉市某三甲医院85例行间歇导尿的患者进行问卷调查,用Cronbach’sα评估量表的信度,用组内相关系数评估量表的内容效度。结果:英文原版量表有13个条目,中文版量表保留了其中13个。问卷结果显示,整个量表的内容效度指数为0.98,Cronbach’sα为0.904。结论:中文版ICDQ具有较好的信效度,该量表适合中国文化背景下对神经源性膀胱患者导尿情况进行评价和测量。 Objective:To translate the Intermittent Catheterization Difficulty Questionnaire(ICDQ)into Chinese and to evaluate its reliability and validity.Methods:The ICDQ was translated,back-translated,and culturally adapted to create a Chinese version.A survey was conducted among 85 patients undergoing intermittent catheterization at a tertiary hospital in Wuhan,China.Cronbach’sαwas used to assess the scale’s reliability,and the intraclass correlation coefficient was used to evaluate its content validity.Results:The original English version of the scale contains 13 items,all of which were retained in the Chinese version.The survey results showed that the overall content validity index of the scale was 0.98,and Cronbach’sαwas 0.904.Conclusion:The Chinese version of the ICDQ demonstrates good reliability and validity,making it suitable for evaluating and measuring the catheterization conditions of neurogenic bladder patients in the Chinese cultural context.
作者 张晨艳 高杰 ZHANG Chenyan;GAO Jie(Department of Neurology,Tongji Hospital,Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430030,China;Department of Nursing,Tongji Hospital,Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430030,China)
出处 《神经损伤与功能重建》 2024年第6期335-337,共3页 Neural Injury and Functional Reconstruction
基金 华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院基金(基于数字疗法的宫颈癌根治术后膀胱功能障碍预防模式的构建,No.2022D05 压力性生活实践影响焦虑、抑郁的机制及其干预:临床与非临床群体的对比研究,No.2018YJJA07)。
关键词 神经源性膀胱 间歇导尿困难评估量表 信效度 neurogenic bladder Intermittent Catheterization Difficulty Questionnaire reliability and validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献32

共引文献186

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部