期刊文献+

高质量发展视域下美国生涯与技术教育评价指标体系构建与启示

Construction and Inspiration of the Evaluation Index System of Career and Technical Education in the United States under the Perspective of High-quality Development
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为实现高质量发展目标,美国生涯与技术教育亟需考察经费投入效果,转变问责评价重点,并构建了以“评价维度—评价要素—评价标准”为核心的三级评价指标体系。该指标体系具有评价维度立足多视角和全方位,评价要素体现全纳性和公平性,评价标准重视以学生为中心等特征。借鉴其基本思路,我国职业教育评价指标体系的构建,需树立全面的高质量评价观、关注多元化的评价主体需求、设计以人为本的评价内容。 In order to achieve the goal of high-quality development,career and technical education in the United States urgently needs to examine the effectiveness of fund investment and shift the focus of accountability and evaluation.A three-level evaluation index system has established,and the cores of this system are"evaluation dimensions,evaluation elements and evaluation standards".The index system has the characteristics that the evaluation dimensionis based on multiple perspectives and entirety,the evaluation elements reflect inclusiveness and fairness,and the evaluation criteria attach importance to student-centered.Drawing on its basic idea,the construction of China's vocational education evaluation index system needs to establish comprehensive and high-quality evaluation view,focus on the needs of diversified evaluation subjects,and design people-oriented evaluation content.
作者 陈磊 张宇 CHEN Lei;ZHANG Yu(Nantong University,Nantong Jiangsu 226019,China)
机构地区 南通大学
出处 《职业教育研究》 2024年第6期91-96,共6页 Vocational Education Research
基金 2021年国家社会科学基金教育学一般课题“基于高质量发展目标的我国职教评价指标体系构建研究”(编号:BJA210104)。
关键词 美国 生涯与技术教育 高质量发展 评价指标体系 the United States career and technical education high-quality development evaluation index system
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献30

  • 1倪淑萍.高职院校通识教育与专业教育融合发展探索[J].教育学术月刊,2021(5):107-111. 被引量:13
  • 2龙献忠.论高等教育多中心治理的参与协商机制[J].高等工程教育研究,2004,52(5):53-55. 被引量:17
  • 3薄启亮,刘贵洲,麦巍.绩效管理的核心流程[J].中国人才,2005(03S):50-51. 被引量:6
  • 4R.J.S Macpherson.(1996).Educative Accountability:Theory,Practice,Policy and Research in Educational Administration.Oxford,U.K.:Pergamon,44.
  • 5黄振球.绩优学校与绩效责任.中等教育,1999,(6):14-14.
  • 6黄哲彬.论推动学校绩效责任之执行策略[N].教育趋势导报,2004-5-8(5).
  • 7Kenneth Leithwood & Lorna Earl.Accountability In Education:Four Models.http://www.mcle.ws/notebookvol 13no2.pdf.2006-02-04.
  • 8吴政达.教育绩效责任之内涵与运作.教育研究月刊(台湾),(96):34-34.
  • 9Williamson M.Evers &Herbert J.Walberg.Accountability Models.Standford University Press,c2002:pp74-75.
  • 10Mark E.Fetler.Carrot or Stick?How Do School Performance Reports Work?Educational Policy Analysis Archives,Vol2,No.13.1994 (10).http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v2n 13.html.2005-11-24.

共引文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部