合理的全球正义何以可能

How Is Reasonable Global Justice Possible

当代西方全球正义理论各有自身的优势和不足。世界主义关注全球贫困问题的根源和解决途径,但没有看到解决问题的根本途径在于改变资本主义生产方式。民族主义强调民族国家自身的利益,却忽略了各民族的彼此依存性。新斯多亚主义指出国际社会应帮助贫困国家满足其成员的能力需求,然而没有提出具体原则。总之,它们都代表着西方价值观,比较单一化。合理的全球正义应具有融贯性和普遍有效性。我们应重新思考这一问题。具体而言,需要考虑如下内容:促进世界的和平与发展;削减世界各国不平等现象;消除全球贫困;建立公正的国际政治经济新秩序。

Contemporary western global justice theory has its own advantages and disadvantages.Cosmopolitanism focuses on the central causes and solutions to the global poverty problem,but does not see that the fundamental solution to this problem is to change the capitalist mode of production.Nationalism emphasizes the interests of the nation-state itself,but ignores the interdependence of the various ethnic groups.New-Stoicism states that the international community should help poor countries meet the capacity needs of its members,yet no specific principles.Market socialism advocates to establish the market socialism in many countries,which violates historical materialism.In short,they all represent Western values.So,a reasonable theory of global justice should be inclusive and universally effective.In conclusion,reasonable theories of global justice need to consider the following:promoting world peace and development,reducing inequality in the world,eliminating global poverty,and establishing a just new international political and economic order.