期刊文献+

我国科普人才培训现状研究——结合典型案例CIPP评价

Practical exploration of popular science talent training in China based on CIPP evaluation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国科普人才培训工作已具备一定的基础,但整体发展比较缓慢,相关研究也比较薄弱。文章聚焦于我国科普人员培训的重点项目,在系统全面分析其发展现状的基础上,针对典型西部基层科普人才培训案例,运用CIPP评价模型从背景、输入、过程、结果四个方面进行深入评价。进一步统合分析得出研究结论,总结现存问题,提出创新发展策略。研究表明,我国科普人才培训工作构建了常态化工作体系机制,形成了比较稳定的基本模式,逐步走向了规范化,受到科普工作者、地方科协和有关机构的普遍欢迎。但还存在较多问题,例如:培训供给不足,未建立完善的培训标准体系,缺乏对学员职业发展的持续关照,培训内容存在失衡,培训过程缺乏实操性。围绕以上问题提出四点建议:一是建立科普人员培训保障体系和培训标准体系,提升引领与指导作用;二是加强顶层设计与指导,构建常态化规范化科普人员培训体系机制;三是把握实际需求及学员特点,平衡培训内容及方式;四是实施新时代科普人员培训重点工程,为培训持续健康发展提供支撑。 In China,science popularization talents training has laid a certain foundation,but the overall development is relatively slow,and the relevant research is also insufficient.This paper focuses on the key training projects of popular science popularization personnel in China.On the basis of a systematic and comprehensive analysis of its development status,the CIPP evaluation model uses four aspects of background,input,process and results for in-depth training cases of typical grassroots science popularization talents in western China.Further integration analysis obtains the research conclusions,summarizes the existing problems,and puts forward the innovative development strategies.The results show that China's training of science popularization personnel in China has established a regular working system and mechanism,formed a relatively stable basic mode,and gradually moved towards standardization,which has been widely welcomed by popular science workers,local science and technology associations and relevant institutions.However,there are still many problems,such as lack of training supply and a perfect training standard system,lack of continuous care for the career development of students,imbalance of training content,and lack of practical training process.Four suggestions have been put forward for regarding the issue:Firstly,establish a guarantee system and standard system for the training of science popularization personnel to enhance their leading and guiding roles.Secondly,strengthen top-level design and guidance,and construct a normalized and standardized training system mechanism for science popularization personnel.Thirdly,grasping the actual needs and characteristics of trainees,and balancing the training content and methods.Fourthly,implementing key projects for the training of science popularization personnel in the new era to provide support for the sustainable and healthy development of training.
作者 牛桂芹 辛兵 曹茂甲 周磊 Niu Guiqin;Xin Bing;Cao Maojia;Zhou Lei(Center for Professional Training and Services,China Association for Science and Technology,Beijing 100081,China;Children and Youth Science Center of CAST,Beijing 100863,China;Liaoning Normal University School of Education,Dalian 116029,China)
出处 《今日科苑》 2024年第4期50-61,共12页 Modern Science
关键词 典型案例 CIPP评价 科普人才 培训现状 science popularization talents training practice key case CIPP evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献17

  • 1高振强.CIPP教育评价模式述评[J].教学与管理(中学版),1998,0(Z1):57-59. 被引量:39
  • 2瞿葆奎主编 陈玉琨 赵永年选编.教育评价[A]..教育学文集[C].北京:人民教育出版杜,1989.301,300,309.
  • 3代蕊华.国内外主要教育评价模式述评[J].中国高等教育评估,1996,(1).
  • 4Stufflebeam,D.L.,&Madsus,G.F.& Kellaghan,T.,(2000),Evaluation Models:Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation(2nd.ed.)[M].Boston:Kluwer Academic Publishers.280,287,313.
  • 5Stufflebeam,D.L.,&Shinkfield,A.J.(1985).Systematic Evaluation[M].Boston:Kluwer Nijhoff,170-171.
  • 6Blaine R. Worthen & James R. Sanders (1981), Education Evaluation: Alternative Approeches and Practical Guidelines [ M ]. New York & London:Longman.84.
  • 7中华人民共和国科学技术部政策法规与体制改革司.中国科普统计2010[M]北京:科学技术文献出版社,2010.
  • 8任福君;张义忠.打造高效的科普人才培养体系[N]学习时报,2012.
  • 92007公民科学素质调查结果发布[J].科协论坛,2008(12):48-48. 被引量:5
  • 10万群,沈扬,杨湘杰,沈琼.高校科普人才培养模式及其对策研究[J].学会,2009(2):43-46. 被引量:21

共引文献191

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部