摘要
战国文字尤其是楚文字中有一“■”及从“■”之字,过去或释为“触”,或释为“解”之省形。通过与战国文字“解”字形对比之后,发现确定的“解”皆从刀/刃,“■”应释为“触”。上博简《孔子诗论》简20、清华简《心是谓中》简4的“■(触)”如字读,前者训为触犯,后者训为狂妄抵触。从“■(触)”之字也应从“■”之读音去解释,其中荆门左冢漆梮“■”可能读为“歜”,训为盛气怒;上博简《曹沫之阵》简16的“■”可能读为“■”,训为敬或善;清华简《汤在啻门》简8的“■”可能读为“属”,训为足。清华简《治邦之道》简14整理者释为“解”的不清楚之字,可能读为“■”,训为“结”;或从“■”声读为“属”,训为“结”或“聚”。
In Warring States script,especially in Chu script there occurs the character“■”and characters with the component“■”.Previously,these were interpreted as chu触,or a short form of jie解.After comparing it to Warring States forms of the character jie,it was found that all characters write jie,contain either the dao刀or ren刃components,and that“■”should be interpreted as chu触.The chu ■ on slip 20 of the Kongzi shilun孔子诗论from volume 1 of the Shanghai Museum Manuscripts should be read as“violate.”The chu ■ on slip 4 of Xin shi wei zhong心是谓中in volume 8 of the Tsinghua Manuscripts is understood as“conflict.”Characters that have the chu ■(触)component should also be read accordingly.Chu GF8AF in the Zuozhong Qiju左冢漆梮may have been read as chu歜and understood as“rage.”Zhu GF8AA on slip 16 of the Caomo zhi zhen曹沫之阵in volume 4 of the Shanghai Museum Manuscripts may have been read zhu孎and understood as“respect”or“excellent.”Zhu GF8AA on slip 8 of Tang zai chimen汤在啻门from volume 5 of the Tsinghua Manuscripts may have been read as shu属and understood as“adequate.”The unclear character interpreted as jie解on slip 14 of Zhi bang zhi dao治邦之道in volume 8 of the Tsinghua Manuscripts may have been read as gui絓and understood as“bound.”It is also possible that it was read as shu属and understood as“bound”or“gathered”.
出处
《出土文献》
2024年第2期50-64,170,共16页
Excavated Documents
关键词
楚文字
■
解
Chu script
chu■
jie