期刊文献+

反技术兴奋剂规范的法理基础、逻辑补位与体系构建

Anti Technology Doping:Legal Basis,Logic Reasoning and Rule Construction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 体育领域的技术不当应用起到了类似于兴奋剂的效果,不仅违背了反兴奋剂规范的整体立法宗旨,阻碍了体育公正,消解了运动员的主体性,也危害了体育项目的长远利益。在现有规范体系下,国际、国内的上位法均未承认技术兴奋剂的法律地位,导致了诸多弊端。我国应从法律角度合理界定技术兴奋剂的构成,特别是其与不公平优势之间的因果关系,并从立法、司法和执法三方面入手:(1)推动《世界反兴奋剂条例》承认技术兴奋剂的违法性;(2)推动国际体育仲裁院形成统一、协调、连贯的裁判立场;(3)推动各单项体育联合会制定更具约束力的监管措施,构建反技术兴奋剂的立体规范体系,切实维护我国的正当体育利益和全世界的体育公正。 The misuse of technology in sport functions as stimulants,which not only violates the legislative purpose of anti-doping rules,but hinders the fairness and justice of sports competitions,dispels the subjectivity of athletes,and endangers the long-term interests of specific sports.Under the existing regulatory system,the legal status of anti technology doping law has yet to be found in the higher-level laws domestically and abroad,leading to multiple legal problems.Therefore,China should rationally define the composition of technology doping,especially its causality with unfair advantages,and take actions from three perspectives,namely,legislative,judicial and enforcement:to promote World Anti-Doping Code to acknowledge the illegality of technical stimulants;to push the formation of a unified,coordinated and coherent judgment attitude of CAS;and to promote the formulation of more coercive regulatory measures and regulatory system of anti technology doping,thus to effectively safeguard the legitimate interests of sports.
作者 孙遥 SUN Yao(Civil and Commercial Law School,Shandong University of Political Science and Law,Jinan 250014,Shandong,China)
出处 《上海体育大学学报》 北大核心 2024年第6期27-38,共12页 Journal of Shanghai University of Sport
基金 山东省社会科学规划研究项目(22DFXJ07)。
关键词 兴奋剂 反技术兴奋剂 法理基础 因果关系 体系构建 doping anti technology doping legal basis causality rule construction
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

二级参考文献307

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部