国际期刊论文研究主题的国际化特征研究——以我国教育领域为例

Internationalization features of research topics in international journal articles:A case study of education field in China

【目的】实现国际期刊论文研究主题国际化特征的多维测度与多元划分。【方法】以我国教育领域为例,对比国内外期刊论文的研究主题分布,揭示二者之间的差异;从研究对象、主导国家、引用影响力和受众多样性4个维度,剖析国际期刊论文研究主题的国际化特征;构建TPUR主题分类框架,将国际期刊论文研究主题划分至不同类型以总结相关规律。【结果】我国教育领域的国际论文发表呈现出中国关注国际、国际关注中国的双向图景,中国和他国主导论文的关注重点和影响力存在差异;相较而言,致力于解决国际共性问题的理论性研究主题和聚焦中国本土问题的实践性研究主题具有更鲜明的国际化特征。【结论】科研人员需要把握好国际学界关注的议题,恰当选择国内外期刊发表论文;科研管理部门也需要建立合理的科研评价导向,为科研人员选择论文发表渠道提供科学引导。

[Purposes]This study aims to achieve a multidimensional measurement and diverse categorization of the internationalization features pertaining to the research topics of international journal articles.[Methods]By taking the field of education in China as an example,this paper compared the distribution of research topics in Chinese and international journal articles to reveal the differences between them.Four dimensions including research objects,leading countries,citation influence,and audience diversity were adopted to analyze the internationalization features of research topics in international journal articles.The TPUR topic classification framework was constructed to categorize research topics in international journal articles into different types,so as to summarize relevant patterns.[Findings]The publication of international articles in the field of education in China presents a dual perspective of China focusing on international issues and the international community focusing on China.There are differences in the focal points and influence of articles led by China and other countries.In comparison,theoretical research topics dedicated to addressing international common issues and practical research topics focusing on China's local issues exhibit more distinct internationalization features.[Conclusions]Researchers need to appropriately grasp topics of interest in international academia and choose suitable Chinese and international journals for article publication.Scientific research management departments should establish a rational scientific research evaluation framework to guide scholars in selecting appropriate article publication channels.