期刊文献+

宫颈成熟度评估及促宫颈成熟方法的研究进展

Research Progress in Cervical Ripening Assessment and Methods of Cervical Ripening
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着社会发展和我国生育政策的改变,高危妊娠的比例逐渐增加,这也导致医学原因所致的引产增多,而宫颈成熟是引产成功的关键。因此,准确评估并有效促进宫颈成熟已成为临床研究的焦点。目前关于宫颈成熟度的评估主要采用宫颈评分和超声测量,宫颈Bishop′s评分具有一定主观性,联合超声测量可增加评估的客观性,但仍应完善超声敏感指标,提高超声测量技术。促宫颈成熟的方法主要包括药物法和机械法,两者成功率均不高,且药物法存在子宫过度刺激的风险,机械法则具有母胎感染的风险。因此,未来进一步完善宫颈成熟度评估及促宫颈成熟的方法,可以为疾病的治疗提供新思路。 With the development of society and the change of fertility policy in China,the increase in the proportion of high-risk pregnancies has led to the increase of labor induction for medical reasons,and cervical ripening is the key to the success of labor induction.Therefore,how to accurately assess and effectively promote cervical ripening has become a focus in the clinical study.At present,the evaluation of cervical maturity mainly uses cervical scoring and ultrasound measurement.The cervical Bishop′s score has a certain degree of subjectivity,and combined ultrasound measurement can increase the objectivity of the evaluation.However,it is still necessary to improve ultrasound sensitive indicators and improve ultrasound measurement technology.The main methods for promoting cervical ripening include drug therapy and mechanical therapy,both of which have low success rates.Drug therapy carries the risk of excessive uterine stimulation,while mechanical therapy carries the risk of maternal fetal infection.Therefore,further improving the research on cervical maturity assessment and methods to promote cervical ripening in the future can provide new ideas for the treatment of diseases.
作者 李娟 钟惠敏 LI Juan;ZHONG Huimin(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University,Guangzhou 510000,China)
出处 《医学综述》 CAS 2024年第14期1711-1716,1722,共7页 Medical Recapitulate
关键词 引产 宫颈评分 超声弹性成像 促宫颈成熟 药物基因组学 Induction of labor Cervical score Ultrasound elastography Cervical ripening Pharmacogenomics
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献92

  • 1柳丽清.一次性低温水囊与常温水囊促宫颈成熟的比较[J].锦州医学院学报,2006,27(3):67-67. 被引量:1
  • 2丰有吉,沈铿.妇产科学[M].2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2010:325.
  • 3Appropriate technology for birth [J], Lancet, 1985, 2(8452): 436-437.
  • 4Martin .IA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJ, et al. Births: final data for 2013 [J]. Natl Vital Stat Rep, 2015, 64(1): 1-65.
  • 5BISHOP EH. PELVIC SCORING FOR ELECTIVE INDUCTION [J]. Obstet Oynecol, 1964, 24: 266-268.
  • 6Burnett JE Jr. Preinduction scoring: an objective approach to induction of labor [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 1966, 28(4): 479-483.
  • 7Park KH, Kim SN, Lee SY, et al, Comparison between sonographie cervical lensth and Bishop score in preinduction cervical assessment: a randomized trial [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Oynecol, 2011, 38(2): 198-204.
  • 8Kolkman DO, Verhoeven C J, Brinkhorst SJ, et al. The Bishop score as a predictor of labor induction success: a systematic review[J]. Am J Perinatol, 2013, 30(8): 625-630.
  • 9Keepanasseril A, Suri V, Bagga R, et al. Pre-induction sonographic assessment of the cervix in the prediction of successful induction of labour in nulliparous women[J]. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 2007, 47(5): 389-393.
  • 10Sieroszewski P, Banach R. [Comparison of the predictive value of digital examination (Bishop's score) and ultrasound evaluation for labor induction success] [J]. Ginekol Pol, 2010, 81(2): 105-110.

共引文献338

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部