期刊文献+

供应商风险规避下平台商的销售模式选择研究

Sales mode selection of e-tailer under supplier risk aversion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于1个供应商和1个平台商组成的供应链,通过考虑供应商的风险规避特性,建立了混合模式、转售模式以及代理模式下的均值-方差模型,研究了供应商风险规避下平台商的最优销售模式选择问题。研究发现:当佣金率较低时,无论供应商的风险规避程度大小,平台商应始终选择转售模式;当佣金率较高时,若供应商的风险规避程度较小,平台商应选择混合模式,若供应商的风险规避程度较大,平台商应选择转售模式。供应商的风险规避程度越大对自身越不利,但在转售模式下和混合模式的某些情形下对平台商越有利。当佣金率和供应商的风险规避程度在一定区间内时,平台商选择混合模式可以实现供应链成员的共赢。 In this paper,we focus on a supply chain consisting of a supplier and an e-tailer which has an online plat-form.By considering the supplier’s risk-aversion character,we establish the mean-variance models under the hybrid mode,reselling mode and agency mode.Through comparing and analysing the equilibrium solutions of these models,we explore the optimal sales mode selection of the e-tailer when the supplier is risk-averse.The results show as follows:when the commission rate is low,the e-tailer’s optimal choice is the reselling mode regardless of the supplier’s risk-aver-sion degree;when the commission rate is high,the e-tailer’s optimal choice is the hybrid mode if the supplier’s risk-aversion degree is small,otherwise,the e-tailer’s optimal choice is the reselling mode.No matter which sales mode the e-tailer chooses,the supplier will suffer from its own increased risk-aversion degree;under the reselling mode and the spe-cific circumstance of the hybrid mode,the e-tailer will benefit from the supplier’s increased risk-aversion degree.When the commission rate and the supplier’s risk-aversion degree are within a certain range,adopting the hybrid mode by the e-tailer can achieve a win-win situation for the supply chain members.
作者 翟怀启 魏杰 邵同 ZHAI Huaiqi;WEI Jie;SHAO Tong(School of Economics and Management,Hebei University of Technology,Tianjin 300401,China)
出处 《河北工业大学学报》 CAS 2024年第3期87-96,共10页 Journal of Hebei University of Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71971076)。
关键词 平台商 转售模式 代理模式 混合模式 风险规避 均值-方差模型 e-tailer reselling mode agency mode hybrid mode risk-aversion mean-variance model
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献89

  • 1黄帅,樊治平.不同渠道权力结构下资金约束零售商的采购和融资策略[J].中国管理科学,2020,0(1):79-88. 被引量:20
  • 2赵道致,何龙飞.Downside-Risk控制下的供应链合作契约研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2007,27(4):34-40. 被引量:21
  • 3Pan, K. , Lai, K.K. , Liang, L. , Leung, S. C. H.. Two-period pricing and ordering policy for the dominant retailer in a two-echelon supply chain with demand uncertainty[J]. Omega, 2009,37 : 919 -- 929.
  • 4Gan, X. , Cakanyildirim, M. , Sethi, S. P.. Contracting under asymmetric information on the cost of production [R]. Working paper,The University of Texas at Dallas, USA, 2004.
  • 5Lau,A. H. L. , Lau,H. S. , Wang, J.C.. How a dominant retailer might design a purchase contract for a newsvendor-type product with price-sensitive demand[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2008, 190: 443--458.
  • 6Chen,K. B. , Xiao, T. J.. Demand disruption and coordination of the supply chain with a dominant retailer [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 197:225--234.
  • 7Wang, X. L. , Liu, L. W.. Coordination in a retailerled supply chain through option contract [J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2007,110: 1- 13.
  • 8Li,S. J. , Zhu,Z. B. , Huang, L. H.. Supply chain coordination and decision making under consignment contract with revenue sharing[J]. International Journal of Production Economies, 2008,120 ( 1 ) :88 -- 99.
  • 9Hendricks, K. B. ,Singhal, V. R.. An empirical analysis of the effect of supply chain disruptions on long-run stock price performance and equity risk of the firm [J].Production and Operations Management, 2005,14 ( 1 ) : 35--52.
  • 10Gan,X. H. , Sethi,S. P. ,Yan, H.M.. Channel coordination with a risk-neutral supplier and a downside-risk- averse retailer[J]. Production and Operations Manage ment,2005,14(1) :80--89.

共引文献229

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部