摘要
康德哲学中存在道德动力不足、道德责任两头落空的问题,牟宗三提出本体论的觉情正是为了解决这一问题。李明辉接续牟宗三的思路,援引舍勒的现象学伦理学思想,对本体论觉情做了诠释。但是,基于牟宗三提出的圆教模型,李明辉之论尚是权说,仍属别教形态。照此逻辑,牟宗三提出的无情之情才是道德情感问题的最终解决途径,不过新的问题又继之而来,因为圆教形态下的无情之情并非感性形态,马克思的实践哲学不失为走出这一理论困境的有效途径。
The problem of insufficient moral motivation and moral responsibility falling at both aspects in Kant’s philosophy is addressed by Mou Zongsan’s proposal of ontological feeling.Li Minghui followed Mou’s line of thought by invoking Scheler's phenomenological ethics to substantiate ontological feeling,but based on Mou’s pattern of perfect teaching,Li's theory is still a discriminating speech and still belongs to the form of distinct teaching.According to this logic,Mou’s proposed the feelingless feeling is the final solution to the problem of moral feeling,but a new problem follows,because the feelingless feeling in the pattern of perfect teaching is not a sensual form,and Marx’s practical philosophy is an effective way out of this theoretical dilemma.
出处
《孔子研究》
北大核心
2024年第3期99-107,159,共10页
Confucius Studies
关键词
道德情感
现象学伦理学
圆教
牟宗三
Moral Feeling
Phenomenological Ethics
Perfect Teaching
Mou Zongsan