生态环境损害赔偿磋商行政性质下司法确认制度存在正当性

Legitimacy of Existence of Judicial Confirmation System Under Administrative Nature of Consultation on Compensation for Ecological and Environmental Damage

司法确认制度首次适用于公益领域,宜以全新视角视之。在明确生态环境损害赔偿磋商行政性质前提下,首先从宏观制度视角审视,明确司法确认制度作为相关法律配套执行机制的一种,其存在是为了保证赔偿协议履行的时效性,并不具有民事或行政性质色彩。再者,以微观具体制度角度视之,分别从司法确认制度及生态环境损害赔偿磋商制度出发,探究司法确认制度创立目的,结合最新法律规定,聚焦生态环境损害赔偿磋商领域下“协商行政”这一全新柔性行政执法手段,为生态磋商行政性质下司法确认制度存在提供理论支撑。

We should view the first application of judicial confirmation system in the public welfare field from a new perspective.Macroscopically, on the premise that the administrative nature of the consultation on ecological and environmental damage compensation is confirmed, it is clear that the judicial confirmation system serves as one of the supporting enforcement mechanisms of relevant laws, the existence of which ensures the timeliness of the performance of the compensation agreement, and does not have civil or administrative nature.Microcosmically, based on the judicial confirmation system and the ecological and environmental damage compensation consultation system, this paper explored the establishment purpose of the judicial confirmation system, combined with the latest laws, and focused on the new flexible enforcement means of administrative law, the “consultative administration” in the field of consultation on ecological and environmental damage compensation, providing theoretical support for the existence of judicial confirmation system under the administrative nature of ecological consultation.