基于化学成分与药理作用评价当归-黄芪药对配方颗粒汤剂与传统汤剂的差异

Evaluation of the Difference Between Angelica-Astragalus Medicine Pair DispensingGranules Decoction and Traditional Decoction Based on Chemical Composition andPharmacological Action

目的评价当归-黄芪药对配方颗粒汤剂(DGD)与传统汤剂在化学成分和药理效应方面的差异,为合理应用该配方颗粒提供参考。方法以原料来源批次统一和不统一2种对比方式,设不同样品组,采用高效液相色谱(HPLC)法建立特征图谱,从特征图谱相似度、成分种类、指标成分含量、共有峰面积等角度对化学成分进行评价;采用失血性血虚模型小鼠评价药效。结果①DGD特征图谱与传统汤剂相似度较高(相似度>0.87);②共有色谱峰数目不一致,传统汤剂-自购饮片和传统汤剂-A厂饮片共有色谱峰各12个,A厂DGD共有色谱峰15个,B厂DGD共有色谱峰10个;③A厂DGD中阿魏酸、毛蕊异黄酮苷含量高于传统汤剂(P<0.05);B厂DGD与传统汤剂阿魏酸含量差异无统计学意义,但毛蕊异黄酮苷含量较传统汤剂低(P<0.05);④DGD共有峰面积总和与传统汤剂相比,自购传统汤剂、A厂传统汤剂及A厂配方颗粒、B厂配方颗粒中各成分含量相对比值分别为1.00、0.96、2.14、0.60;⑤DGD及传统汤剂均能明显促进失血性贫血模型小鼠血红蛋白(Hb)、红细胞(RBC)恢复(P<0.01);与模型对照组比较,除B厂DGD组外均差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);A厂DGD与传统汤剂差异无统计学意义,B厂DGD与传统汤剂差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论无论原料来源批次是否一致,DGD与传统汤剂在化学成分上均存在一定差异;在药理作用上,来源于同一批次饮片制备的DGD与传统汤剂对改善失血性贫血药效相当,来源于不同批次饮片制备的DGD与传统汤剂在药效上存在一定差异;不同来源批次的饮片和不同制备工艺造成不同厂家配方颗粒存在质量差异,说明国家统一配方颗粒质量标准及制定相关过程规范具有必要性与紧迫性。

Objective To evaluate the differences in chemical composition and pharmacological effects between Angelica-Astragalus medicine pair decoction(DGD)and traditional decotion,and to provide a reference for the rational clinical application of Danggui Buxue decoction.Methods With the two comparison methods of unified and non-uniform raw material source batches,we set up different sample groups,established characteristic maps by HPLC,and evaluated the chemical components based on the similarity of characteristic maps,component types,index component content,common peak area,and other factors.The efficacy of the drug was evaluated in the hemorrhagic blood deficiency model mice.Results①The similarity of the feature map between the DGD and TD was high(similarity was greater than 0.87).②The number of chromatographic peaks was inconsistent.Traditional decoction from self-purchased decoction pieces,or traditional decoction-Factory A decoction pieces had a total of 12 chromatographic peaks each.The DGD of Factory A had a total of 15 chromatographic peaks.There were 10 chromatographic peaks in the DGD of Factory B.③The contents of ferulic acid and calycosin 7-O-glucoside(CG)in DGD of Factory A were higher than those in traditional decoction(P<0.05,n=3).There was no significant difference between DGD and TD ferulic acid content in Factory B,but the content of CG was lower than that in traditional decoction(P<0.05).④The total area of common peaks in DGD was different from that in TD.The relative total ratios of the contents of the components in the self-purchased traditional decoction pieces,the traditional decoction pieces of Factory A,the formula granules of Factory A,and the formula granules of Factory B were 1.00,0.96,2.14,0.60,respectively.⑤Both DGD and traditional decoction could significantly promote the recovery of hemoglobin and red blood cells in hemorrhagic anemia model mice(P<0.01);Compared with the model control group,there was a significantly difference(P<0.05)except for the DGD group of Plant B.There was no significant difference between DGD and TD of Plant A,but there was a very significant difference between DGD and TD of Plant B(P<0.01).Conclusion Whether the raw material source batch is consistent or not,DGD and TD have certain differences in chemical composition.In terms of pharmacological effect,DGD,prepared from a unified batch of decoction pieces,has similar efficacy to traditional decoction in alleviating hemorrhagic anemia.There are certain differences in the pharmacological effects between DGD prepared from different batches of decoction pieces and traditional decoctions.The differences caused by the different preparation processes of the same source batch of prepared slices were compared,and the quality differences of the formula granules from different manufacturers were caused by the different source batches of prepared slices and different preparation processes,indicating the necessity and urgency of the country to formulate a unified quality standard for formula granules and related process specifications.