期刊文献+

水中粪大肠菌群的测定——多管发酵法与酶底物法的比较

Determination of fecal coliform in water——comparison of multi-tube fermentation method and enzyme substrate method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用多管发酵法和酶底物法,同步测定30个平行样品中的粪大肠菌群。比较数据结果表明,2种方法测定的实验结果具有相关性,且在统计学上没有显著差异。多管发酵法虽作为经典的粪大肠菌群检测方法,需要的试剂和器材比较多,分析步骤多,检测周期长,样品检测结果的相对偏差明显高于酶底物法。酶底物法检测周期短,操作方便,对试验环境条件要求低,弥补了多管发酵法的不足能更好满足环境监测要求。 Simultaneous determination of fecal coliforms in 30 parallel samples was carried out by using the multi-tube fermentation method and the enzymatic substrate method.The results of the comparative data showed that the experimental results determined by the two methods were correlated and not statistically significantly different.Although the multi-tube fermentation method,as a classical method for fecal coliform detection,requires more reagents and equipment,more analytical steps,and a long detection cycle,the relative deviation of the sample results was significantly higher than that of the enzyme substrate method.The enzyme substrate method has a shorter detection period,is easy to operate,and requires less environmental conditions,which makes up for the shortcomings of the multi-tube fermentation method and can better meet the requirements of environmental monitoring.
作者 张茵 李曼 陈雅斐 Zhang Yin;Li Man;Chen Yafei(Hebei Province Ecology Environmental Monitoring Center,Shijiazhuang 050000,China)
出处 《煤炭与化工》 CAS 2024年第5期148-151,共4页 Coal and Chemical Industry
关键词 多管发酵法 酶底物法 粪大肠菌群 对数 相对标准偏差 T检验 multitube fermentation method enzyme substrate method fecal coliform bacteria logarithms relative standard deviation t-test
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献33

  • 1刘京梅,张凌,赵君,粱伟.饮用水中大肠菌群检测技术的研究进展[J].国外医学(卫生学分册),2006,33(2):117-121. 被引量:20
  • 2颜朝阳,魏群.水处理消毒技术现状及研究进展[J].甘肃科技,2006,22(8):131-133. 被引量:5
  • 3熊小京,曹晓婷.EM菌在污水生物处理工艺中的应用[J].环境卫生工程,2007,15(3):11-14. 被引量:13
  • 4中华人民共和国卫生部.GB5749-2006生活饮用水卫生标准[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2006.
  • 5中华人民共和国卫生部,中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T5750.12-2006生活饮用水标准检验方法微生物指标[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2006.
  • 6Sahota P, Pandove G, Achal V, et al. Evaluation of a BWTK for detection of total colifo~s, E. coli and emerging pathogens from drinking water: comparison with standard MPN method [J]. WaterSciTechnol, 2010, 62(3): 676 -683.
  • 7Grant MA. A new membrane filtration medium for simultaneous detection and enumeration of Escherichia coli and total cofiforms[ J ]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1997, 63 (9) : 3526 - 3530.
  • 8Byamukama D, Mach RL, Kansiime F, et al. Discrimination ef- ficacy of fecal pollution detection in different aquatic habitats of a high-altitude tropical country, using presumptive coliforms, Escherichia coli, and Clostridium perfringens spores[ J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2005, 71 ( 1 ) : 65 - 71.
  • 9Niemela SI, Lee JV, Fricker CR. A comparison of the Interna- tional Standards Organisation reference method for the detection of coliforms and Escherichia coli in water with a defined substrate procedure[J]. J Appl Microbiol, 2003, 95 : 1285 - 1292.
  • 10Tryland I, Fiksdal L. Enzyme characteristics of beta-D-galactosi- dase-and beta-D-glucuronidase-posifive bacteria and their inter- ferenee in rapid methods for detection of waterborne coliforms and Eseheriehia coli [J] Appl Environ Microbiol, 1998, 64 (3) : 1018 -1023.

共引文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部