期刊文献+

刑事司法领域自动化决策的风险与规制

The Risks and Regulation of Automated Decision-Making in the Field of Criminal Justice
下载PDF
导出
摘要 自动化决策在中外各国的刑事司法领域已有广泛应用,其原因在于自动化决策符合刑事司法预防和打击犯罪、提高诉讼效率、实现案件公正办理的需求,也有相应的观念和技术条件予以支持。然而自动化决策在刑事司法中的应用可能带来准确性不足、公正性偏离和机械性三方面的风险,应采取措施对自动化决策进行规制,以达到补足准确性、保障公正性和消解机械性的效果,实现自动化决策在刑事司法领域的法治化应用。 Automated decision-making has been widely applied in the field of criminal justice both domestically and interna-tionally,as it aligns with the criminal justice’s needs of preventing and combating crime,improving litigation efficiency,and en-suring the fair handling of cases,supported by corresponding concepts and technological conditions.However,the application of automated decision-making in criminal justice may introduce risks related to accuracy,fairness,and ossification.Measures should be taken to regulate automated decision-making to compensate for accuracy,ensure fairness,and resolve ossification,thereby achieving the law-based application of automated decision-making in the field of criminal justice.
作者 郑曦 ZHENG Xi
出处 《上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 北大核心 2024年第3期98-107,共10页 Journal of Shanghai Normal University(Philosophy & Social Sciences Edition)
基金 教育部高校人文社会科学重点研究基地重点项目“程序法治下的网络安全研究”(23JJD820004) 北京外国语大学卓越人才支持计划。
关键词 自动化决策 刑事司法 预测性警务 智慧司法 证据审查 automated decision-making criminal justice predictive policing smart justice evidence review
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献280

共引文献983

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部