期刊文献+

异议股东回购请求权限制行使析论

To Limit the Determination of the Right to Challenge the Repurchase Request
下载PDF
导出
摘要 限制异议股东股份回购请求权的行使,不仅关系到公司资本的维持,同时也关系到公司债权人的利益,所以在给予异议股东合理保护的同时要防止该权利的异化,以避免造成损害公司以及公司债权人利益的后果。从法律角度出发,建构异议股东的请求回购选择权限制的体系化准则,在制度层面上符合商法的公正性和效率性。在个案层面上,应从单向的目的解释转向体系化的目的解释,通过与其他规范的关联来解释明确效率与公正的具体限制标准。在方法层面上,应在解释学中引入经济分析视角,在市场整体视角下,将成本与效益最大化,在一个合理的适度范围内限制异议股东的权利,保障债权人的合法利益,进而更好地协调个人利益与集体(公共)利益之间的博弈。 It is not only related to the maintenance of the company's capital to restrict the exercise of the dissenting shareholders'right to claim share repurchase,at the same time,it is also related to the interests of the company's creditors,so we should give reasonable protection to the dissenting shareholders and prevent the alienation of the right,in order to avoid damaging the interests of the company and the company's creditors.From a legal point of view,the establishment of the objection shareholder's repurchase option restrictions of the system,in line with the system level of justice and efficiency of commercial law.At the case-by-case level,a shift should be made from a one-way to a systematic interpretation of the purpose,with specific restrictive criteria for clarity of efficiency and fairness explained through linkages with other norms.On the method level,we should introduce the economic analysis angle in the hermeneutics,maximize the cost and benefit,and restrict the dissenting shareholders'rights in a reasonable and moderate range,to protect the legal interests of creditors and better coordinate the interests of individuals to collective(public)interests between the two games.
作者 颜飞 温青美 Yan Fei;Wen Qingmei
出处 《北京政法职业学院学报》 2024年第2期72-79,共8页 Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law
关键词 异议股东 股权回购请求权 债权人保护 权利限制 dissenting shareholders repurchase claims creditor protection right restrictions
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献50

  • 1朱慈蕴.公司资本理念与债权人利益保护[J].政法论坛,2005,23(3):126-134. 被引量:76
  • 2理查德·A.波斯纳:《法理学问题》,中国政法大学出版社2002年版.
  • 3柯华庆.《法律经济学的思维方式》,《制度经济学研究》第9辑,经济科学出版社,2005年版.
  • 4约翰·C.科菲.《看门人机制:市场中介与公司治理》,黄辉、王长河等译,北京大学出版社2011年版.
  • 5王建文:《论公司资本制度演变的内在逻辑与制度回应》,载《中国商法2014年刊》,第80页.
  • 6郭富青:《我国封闭型公司的新选择:折衷声明资本制》,载《中国商法2014年刊》,第122页.
  • 7Wolfgang Sch6n, The Future of Legal Capital 5 (3) European Business Organization l:lw Review 429, 438 (2004).
  • 8Wolfgang Seh6n, The Future qf Legal Capital 5 (3) European Business Organization Law Review 429, 436438 (2004).
  • 9BAYLESS MANNING & JAMES J. HANKS JR, LEGAL CAPITAL (Foundation Press, 1997, 3:d ed).
  • 10John Armour, Share Capital and Creditor Protection: Efficient Rules for a Modern Company Law 63 The Modem Law Review 355 (2000).

共引文献116

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部