期刊文献+

基于Attention U-Net的乳腺X线图像微钙化检测模型的临床应用

Clinical application of mammogram microcalcification detection model based on Attention U-Net
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:通过开发基于Attention U-Net的乳腺X线图像微钙化检测模型,实现微钙化的高效率检出,并探究不同性质钙化、不同乳腺密度对该深度学习模型微钙化检测性能的影响。方法:回顾性分析接受乳腺常规X线检查的347例患者的694幅图像。通过低年资医师独立阅片,高年资医师审核的方式,建立微钙化检出的参考标准。进行神经网络训练,建立深度学习模型。以钙化面积和数量分别计算,并采用精确率、召回率、F1分数、交并比等指标评估微钙化检测性能,分析不同性质钙化(良性vs恶性)、不同乳腺密度(a+b类vs c+d类)对深度学习模型微钙化检测性能的影响。结果:深度学习模型对微钙化检测的精确率为85.12%±18.39%(以钙化面积计算)和76.72%±19.85%(以钙化数量计算);召回率为78.18%±19.25%(以钙化面积计算)和85.12%±18.39%(以钙化数量计算);交并比为68.29%±21.39%(以钙化面积计算)和67.13%±23.84%(以钙化数量计算);F1分数为78.96%±17.70%(以钙化面积计算)和77.65%±9.37%(以钙化数量计算)。深度学习模型在不同钙化性质(良性vs恶性)中的精确率、召回率、交并比、F1分数之间差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),在不同乳腺密度(a+b类vs c+d类)中对微钙化检测的精确率、召回率、交并比、F1分数之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:基于Attention U-Net的乳腺X线图像微钙化检测模型能够对乳腺微钙化进行有效的检测、有助于乳腺微钙化的定量研究,同时该模型稳定性强,钙化性质及乳腺密度对该模型的检测性能无影响。 Objective To develop a mammogram microcalcification detection model(DL model)based on Attention U-Net for realizing the efficient detection of microcalcifications,and to investigate the effects of breast density and microcalcification type on the microcalcification detection performance of the DLmodel.MethodsAretrospective analysis was performed on 694 images from 347 patients undergoing mammography.Through the independent image diagnosis by junior physicians and review by senior physicians,the reference standard for microcalcification detection was established.Neural network training was performed to establish a DL model.The performance of the model for microcalcification detection was evaluated using precision rate,recall rate,intersection over union(IoU)and F1-score which were calculated based on calcification area or quantity;and the effects of microcalcification type(benign vs malignant)and breast density(a+b vs c+d)on the model performance were also analyzed.Results For detecting microcalcifications by the DLmodel,the precision rate,recall rate,IoU and F1-score were 85.12%±18.39%,78.18%±19.25%,68.29%±21.39%and 78.96%±17.70%when the calculation was based on calcification area,and those were 76.72%±19.85%,85.12%±18.39%,67.13%±23.84%and 77.65%±9.37%when the calculation was based on calcification quantity.The differences in precision rate,recall rate,IoU,F1-score of DL model in different microcalcification types(benign vs malignant)and breast densities(a+b vs c+d)were insignificant.Conclusion The developed mammogram microcalcification detection model based on Attention U-Net can effectively detect breast microcalcifications and is conducive to the quantitative research on breast microcalcifications.Meanwhile,the model exhibits high stability,and the breast density and microcalcification type have trivial effects on the microcalcification detection performance of the model.
作者 孙晓琪 蔡思清 任艳楠 SUN Xiaoqi;CAI Siqing;REN Yannan(Department of Imaging,Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University,Quanzhou 362000,China;Department of Radiology,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University,Quanzhou 362000,China)
出处 《中国医学物理学杂志》 CSCD 2024年第6期716-723,共8页 Chinese Journal of Medical Physics
基金 福建省自然科学基金(2021J01257) 吴阶平医学基金(3206750.2021-06-35)。
关键词 乳腺X线图像 微钙化 人工智能 乳腺密度 mammogram microcalcification artificial intelligence breast density
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献45

  • 1段云云,李坤成,杜祥颖,梁志刚.计算机辅助检测对检出乳腺X线片中成簇微钙化灶的价值[J].医学影像学杂志,2006,16(1):4-6. 被引量:8
  • 2杨正汉,冯逢,王霄英.磁共振成像技术指南[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2010:273.
  • 3Maskarinec G, Morimoto Y, Laguana MB, et al. Bioimpedence to assess breast density as a risk factor for breast cancer in adult women and adolescent girls[J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prey, 2016, 17(1): 65-71.
  • 4Chen X, Moschidis E, Taylor C, et al. Breast cancer risk analysis based on a novel segmentation framework for digital mammograms[J]. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv, 2014, 17(Pt 1): 536-543.
  • 5Hellquist BN, Czene K, Hjalm A, et al. Effectiveness of population-based service screening with mammography for women ages 40 to 49 years with a high or low risk of breast cancer: socioeconomic status, parity, and age at birth of first child[J]. Cancer, 2015, 121(2): 251-258. DOI:10.1002/ encr.29011.
  • 6Marshall NW, van Ongeval C, Bosmans H. Performance evaluation of a retrofit digital detector-based mammography system[J]. Phys Med, 2016, 32(2): 312-322. DOI:10.1016/j. ejmp.2016.01.002.
  • 7Monnin P, Bosmans H, Verdun FR, et al. A comprehensive model for quantum noise characterization in digital mammography[J]. Phys Med Biol, 2016, 61(5): 2083-2108. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/5/2083.
  • 8Heller SL, Hudson S, Wilkinson LS. Breast density across a regional screening population: effects of age, ethnicity and deprivation[J]. Br J Radiol, 2015, 88(1055): 20150242.
  • 9Venturini E, Losio C, Panizza P, et al. Tailored breast cancer screening program with microdose mamrnography, US, and MR Imaging: short-term results of a pilot study in 40-49-year-old women[J]. Radiology, 2013, 268(2): 347-355. DOI: 10.1148/radiol. 13122278.
  • 10Sala M, Domingo L, Macit F, et al. Does digital mammography suppose an advance in early diagnosis? Trends in performance indicators 6 years after digitalization[J]. Eur Radiol, 2015, 25(3): 850-859. DOI:10.1007/ s00330-014-3431-3.

共引文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部