期刊文献+

基于新型交叉效率的资源分配机制

A resource allocation mechanism based on novel cross-efficiency
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文结合数据包络分析(DEA)与合作博弈理论,设计公平合理的资源分配机制.首先建立体现联盟内外部效应的新型交叉效率,这种交叉效率既保留了传统DEA交叉效率的互评本质,又考虑了联盟内部和外部在绩效评价中的差异性,通过赋予决策单元相应的权重,体现联盟内外部不同决策单元重要性的差异;其次,基于新型交叉效率建立合作博弈的特征函数,证明特征函数的超可加性以及相应合作博弈的核心非空性;进一步地,根据特征函数,利用Shapley值设计资源分配机制;最后,通过数值算例和实证分析展现新型交叉效率和权重设置的应用价值. In this paper,we combine data envelopment analysis(DEA)with cooperative game theory to create a fair resource allocation mechanism in alliances.We introduce a novel crossefficiency measure that considers both internal and external effects within alliances.Weight assignments are used to reflect the importance of internal and external DMUs.We establish a cooperative game characteristic function based on this cross-efficiency,show the super-additivity of the characteristic function and prove the core non-emptiness of the cooperative game.Finally,we design a resource allocation mechanism using the Shapley value based on the characteristic function and demonstrate its practical application through a numerical example and an empirical analysis.
作者 张倩伟 刘一博 王新宇 ZHANG Qianwei;LIU Yibo;WANG Xinyu(School of Mathematics,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)
出处 《系统工程理论与实践》 EI CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2024年第5期1522-1533,共12页 Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice
基金 国家自然科学基金(72001207)。
关键词 新型交叉效率 联盟内外部效应 参与者权重 SHAPLEY值 资源分配 novel cross-efficiency internal and external effects within alliances participant weights Shapley values resource allocation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献46

  • 1Seiford L M, Thrall R M. Recent development in DEA: The mathematical programming approach to frontier analysis[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 1990, 46: 7-38.
  • 2Adler N, Friedman L, Zilla S. Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 140:249 265.
  • 3Sexton T R. Data Envelopment Analysis: Critique and Extensions[M]//Silkman R H. Measuring Efficiency: An Assessment of Data Envelopment Analysis. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1986: 73-105.
  • 4Doyle J, Green R. Efficiency and cross efficiency in DEA: Derivations, meanings and the uses[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1994, 45: 567-578.
  • 5Wu J, Liang L, Zha Y, et al. Determination of cross-efficiency under the principle of rank priority in cross- evaluation[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009, 36: 4826-4829.
  • 6Wu J, Liang L, Yang F. Determination of the weights for the ultimate cross efficiency using Shapley value in cooperative game[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009, 36: 872-876.
  • 7Banker R D, Charnes A, Cooper W W. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis[J]. Management Science, 1984, 30(9): 1078 1092.
  • 8Fare R, Grosskopf S. A nonparametric cost approach to scale effficiency[J]. Journal of Economics, 1985, 87: 594~604.
  • 9Cook W D, Kress M. Characterizing an equitable allocation of shared costs: A DEA approach[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1999, 119(3): 652-661.
  • 10Lozano S, Villa G. Centralized resource allocation using data envelopment analysis[J]. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2004, 22(1-2): 143-161.

共引文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部