期刊文献+

结构因果模型中的do算子分析

An Analysis of do-operator in Structural Causal Model
原文传递
导出
摘要 珀尔的形式化干预算子do(.)在他的结构因果模型中占有核心地位。然而由于许多学者对于do算子表达的干预性质及其符号语义有着不够充分的理解,一系列质疑的声音也随之出现。要回应这些质疑,我们应该在结构因果模型的理论背景和框架下剖析do算子本身,不仅要澄清其干预内涵和符号语义,也要厘清它在不同层级因果表达的限制所在。深入把握do算子,我们就能抓住结构因果模型的主要脉络及其关键点。 Pearl’s formalized intervention operator do(.) occupies a central place in his structural causal model.However,since many scholars have an insufficient understanding of the properties and symbolic semantics of the do-operator,a series of critical voices have emerged.To respond to these doubts,we should analyse the do-operator within the theoretical background and framework of the structural causal model,not only to clarify its intervention connotation and symbolic semantics,but also to clarify the limitations of its causal expression at different levels.By grasping the do-operator in depth,we will be able to grasp the main outline of the structural causal model and key points.
作者 胡嘉伟 HU Jiawei(Department of Philosophy,Nanjing University,Nanjing,Jiangsu,210023)
机构地区 南京大学哲学系
出处 《自然辩证法通讯》 CSSCI 北大核心 2024年第6期57-65,共9页 Journal of Dialectics of Nature
基金 国家社科基金重大项目“新一代人工智能驱动的逻辑学研究”(项目编号:20&ZD047)。
关键词 干预 结构因果模型 do算子 反事实 随机对照实验 Intervention SCM do-operator Counterfactual Random controlled experiment
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献9

  • 1von Wright, G. Explanation and Understanding [ M ]. Ithica, New York : Cornell University Press, 1971:65.
  • 2Cook T, Campbell D. Quasi - Experimentation: Design and Analysis Lssues for Field Settings [ M ]. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1979.
  • 3Hoover K. The New Classical Macroeconomics[ M ]. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988 : 173.
  • 4Woodward J. Making things Happen [ M ]. Oxford : Oxford U- niversity Press ,2003.
  • 5Price H, Menzies P. Causation as a Secondary Quality [ J ]. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1993 ,~ (2) :187 -203.
  • 6Eberhardt F, Scheines R. Interventions and Causal Inference [ J ]. Philosophy of Science, 2007,125 (2) :74.
  • 7Hall N. Two concepts of Causation [ C ]//Collins J, Paul L, Hall N. Counterfactuals and Causation. Boston: MIT Press, 2004:225 - 276.
  • 8Lewis D. Causation as Influence[ J]. The Journal of Philoso- phy,2000,97(4) :182 - 197.
  • 9Menzies P. Counterfactual Theories of Causation [ EB/OL ]. [2011 -07 -09 ]. http://plato, stanford, edu/entries/cau- sation - counterfactual/, html.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部