知识生产模式转型下我国大学学科治理现代化的行动路径

Action Paths of China's of University Discipline Governance Modernization during the Transformation of Knowledge Production Mode

学科是知识生产累积制度化的产物,学科治理是以科学善治促进知识发展的过程,学科治理现代化是我国大学治理的根本,高等教育治理体系和治理能力现代化最终要落到大学学科治理现代化。知识生产模式经历了从宗教化知识生产模式到科学知识生产模式1、再到社会弥散式知识生产模式2、再到协同创新的知识生产模式3的变革,大学学科治理主体由单一走向多元、文化由封闭走向开放、结构由线性走向扁平、方式由权威走向协商、资源配置由内部走向全球的新趋势,契合了学科治理现代化的要求。但我国大学学科治理现代化仍存在着学科治理定位不清、权力越界、价值冲突、生态失衡等问题,需要重塑学科学术理性,激发治理内生动力;推进多元主体协商共治,重构学科治理结构;打破学科壁垒,构建和谐共生生态系统;探索数字化治理,提升学科治理效能。

Discipline is the product of the institutional accumulation of knowledge production,and discipline governance is the process of promoting knowledge development through scientific and good governance.Discipline governance modernization is the foundation of China's university governance,and the modernization of higher education governance system and governance capacity will eventually start with the modernization of university discipline governance.Knowledge production mode has undergone a change from religious knowledge production to scientific knowledge production Mode Ⅰ,to social diffuse knowledge production Mode Ⅱ,and then to collaborative innovation knowledge production Mode Ⅲ,which has brought about a new trend of university discipline governance from single subject to pluralistic subjects,from closed to open culture,from a linear to flat structure,from authoritarian to consultative governance,and from internal to global resource allocation,meeting the requirements of discipline governance modernization.However,the modernization of university discipline governance in China still has problems such as unclear positioning of discipline governance,overextended power,value conflict,and ecological imbalance.Therefore,it is necessary to restore the logic of discipline autonomy,stimulate the endogenous driving force of governance,promote multi-subject consultation and co-governance,reshape the governance structure of disciplines,break down disciplinary barriers and build a harmonious and symbiotic ecosystem,explore digital governance and improve the efficiency of discipline governance.