期刊文献+

多重行动异质网络博弈

Heterogeneous Network Games with Multiple Activities
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文研究了具有多重异质性关系网络参与人间的博弈问题,将现有文献中单一网络拓展到多重网络,利用势函数的性质讨论了纳什均衡的存在性、唯一性以及为内点性条件,并在一定假设下对均衡配置进行了降维。本文还给出了模型的两个应用场景--针对具有多重同群效应消费者群体的定价问题和针对具有多重网络关系参与人的干预问题。研究发现,在定价问题中,最优的完全歧视性垄断价格只与消费者边际消费倾向成比例,与同群效应无关;而寡头竞争均衡价格则受到消费者之间复杂关联性的影响。在干预问题中,为了实现最大化的总均衡,行动计划者应该将资源按照参与人在网络中重要性的高低进行分配,该重要性由一个网络中心化度指标来度量。 In many economic settings,who interacts with whom matters.More and more work needs the cooperation of the population.The mutual influence between people forms complex social networks.In recent years,how social networks influence individuals’behavior has become a hot topic in economics research.The traditional literature on social network analysis mainly considers a single social network of the population.However,people often have different partners when faced with various activities.For example,college teach⁃ers must engage both in scientific research and complete teaching tasks.The output of scientific research is closely related to their collaborators’input,and the efforts of their colleagues in teaching have a significant impact on the quality of education.In general,collaborators in research and teaching are different,which implies teachers in a college have different social ties in these two tasks.A heterogeneous network game model with multiple activities and characterizes the existence condition of the Nash equilibrium is constructed.Two applications of the model are also provided to enhance the economic implications.The first is the pricing problem for customers who gain network externalities from their neighbors who consume the same products.Compared to previous studies,it is assumed that consumers’network externalities on different products are heterogeneous.The second is the resource allocation problem among agents with varying cooperation relation⁃ships in multiple tasks.Each agent’s marginal output depends on how many resources she obtained.The plan⁃ner could design a resource allocation scheme to induce agents to exert the maximum total effort.Specifically,the content of this article is structured as follows:A model where players have heterogeneous social network relationships on different tasks is firstly built.Referring to the study of Bramouléet al.(2014),which connects the network game and the potential function,the maximum condition of the potential function is used to characterize the existence and uniqueness of the Nash equilibrium.This condition is closely related to the small⁃est eigenvalue of the technology matrix and the largest eigenvalue of the network matrix.Next,I focus on the uniqueness and the existence of the equilibrium.Under some assumptions of the maximum eigenvalue of network matrices,the equilibrium can be expressed in a closed form.Then comparative static analyses of the exogenous parameters of the game is made.Finally,two applications of the theoretical model are provided.In the pricing problem,it is revealed that the optimal monopoly price for each product is half of the customer’s marginal propensity to consume,and the equilibrium oligopoly prices are proportional to a weighted summation of all customers’marginal consumption propensity.In the resource allocation problem,the planner and agents play a two-stage game.The planner first decides how to allocate resources for different tasks,and each agent then simultaneously selects the effort investment in each task.By backward induction,the planner should allocate resources to agents according to their inter-centrality measure in the network.
作者 熊一凡 Xiong Yifan(School of Economics and Management,Anhui Normal University,Wuhu 241000,China)
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSCD 北大核心 2024年第5期265-274,共10页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
关键词 网络博弈 同群效应 多重行动 异质网络 势博弈 network games peer effects multiple activities heterogeneous networks potential game
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献53

  • 1王先甲,刘佳.基于合作博弈模型的公共河流水资源分配方案研究[J].中国管理科学,2020,0(1):1-9. 被引量:12
  • 2东艳.区域经济一体化新模式——“轮轴—辐条”双边主义的理论与实证分析[J].财经研究,2006,32(9):4-18. 被引量:15
  • 3Goyal S, Joshi S. Bilateralism and free trade[ J]. International Economic Review, 2006, 47 (3) : 749-778.
  • 4Furusawa T, Konishi H. Free trade networks[ J]. Journal of International Economics, 2007, 72 : 310-335.
  • 5Chert M, Joshi S. Third-country effects on the formation of free trade agreements [ J ]. Journal of International Eco- nomics, 2010, 82(2): 238-248.
  • 6Daisaka H, Furusawa T. Dynamic free trade networks: some numerical results[J]. Review of International Economics, 2014, forthcoming.
  • 7Zhang J, Cui Z, Zu L. The evolution of free trade networks [ J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 2014, 38 (c) : 72-86.
  • 8Belleflamme P, Bloch F. Market sharing agreements and collusive networks[ J]. International Economic Review, 2004, 45(2) : 387-411.
  • 9Billand P, Bravard C. Non-cooperative networks in oligopolies[ J ]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2004, 22(5): 593-609.
  • 10Goyyal S ,Joshi S. Network of collaboration in oligopoly[ J ]. Games and Economic Behavior, 2003, 43(1): 57-85.

共引文献65

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部