期刊文献+

“三阶段四维度”视角下学业增值评价的探索——基于13名学生总结感悟的文本分析

原文传递
导出
摘要 为了改革学生评价,更好地发现进步学生,本文提出用好学业增值评价,精准树立典型进步学生的评价探索,以高凌飚的“三阶段四维度”视角对某次全市期末统考中的增值进步“2个标准差”的13名学生的总结感悟进行文本分析,进而发现学生进步发展不仅有赖自身努力,更离不开家校合力。对此,本文给出相关的探讨建议,期望在学生增值评价探索中,把握好影响学生学业的相关因素,转变观念树立科学成才观,促进学生的全面发展。
出处 《课程教学研究》 2024年第3期114-120,共7页 Journal of Curriculum and Instruction
基金 广东省教育科学“十四五”规划中小学教师教育科研能力提升计划(强师工程)重点课题“珠海普通高中学业质量监测工具开发研究”(2022ZQJKO27)的阶段性成果。
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献21

  • 1Scheerens, J (1990). School effectiveness research and the development of process indicators of school functioning,School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 1,(1):61-80.
  • 2Thomas, S. (2001). Dimensions of Secondary School Effectiveness: Comparative Analyses Across Regions.School Effectiveness and School Improvement 12 (3) : 285-322.
  • 3Goldstein, H (1993). Assessment and Accountability,Education, 183, (3): 33-34.
  • 4Sammon.s, P, Thomas, S & Mortimore, P (1997).Forging Links: Effective Schools and Effective Departments,London: Paul Chapman, ISBN 1-85396-349-6.
  • 5Thomas, S (1998). Value Added Measures in School Effeetiveness in the United Kingdom, Prospects, 28. (1): 91-108.
  • 6Goldstein, H (1995). Multilevel Statistical Models, second edition. Kendall's library of statistics 3. London, Sydney,Auckland: Edward Arnold.
  • 7Goldstein, H (1997). Methods in School Effectiveness Research, School Effectiveness & School Improvement, 8, (4)369-395.
  • 8Thomas, S, Sarnmons, P, Mortimore, P & Smees, R(1997). Stability and consistency in secondary schools' effects on students" GCSE outcomes over 3 years, .School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 8, (2): 169-197.
  • 9Scheerens, J., Glas C.& Thomas S. (2003). Educational Evaluation, Assessment and Monitoring: a systemic approach.Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers.
  • 10Teddlie, C. & D. Reynolds (2000). The International Handbook of School Effectiveness Research. London and New York, Routledge Falmer.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部