期刊文献+

基于模糊数学方法评价自动驾驶接管绩效

Evaluate the Performance of Autonomous Driving Takeover Based on Fuzzy Mathematical Methods
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用问卷和实验方法,并利用模糊数学方法探讨接管前置时间、驾驶信任、情绪唤醒以及性别因素对接管绩效的综合影响。结果发现:3s前置时间的接管绩效最佳,5s次之,8s最差;低驾驶信任度的驾驶员接管绩效优于高信任度的;男性驾驶员的接管绩效优于女性,唤起中性情绪时驾驶员的接管绩效优于积极情绪时,并且交互作用显示,男性唤起积极情绪后接管绩效最差。主要结论是,驾驶员的情绪稳定有利于驾驶员在紧急情况下接管车辆。 Based on the evaluation method of fuzzy mathematics,this study explored the comprehensive effects of takeover lead time,driving trust,emotional arousal,and gender factors on takeover performance.Questionnaires and experiments were used to evaluate the performance of the subjects'autonomous driving takeover.The results showed that the takeover performance of 3s lead time was the best,followed by 5s,and the takeover performance of 8s was the worst.Driver takeover performance with low driving trust is better than that with high trust;Male drivers performed better takeovers than women,drivers performed better when neutral emotions were aroused,and interactions showed that men had the worst takeover performance after arousing positive emotions.The main conclusion of this study is that the driver's emotional stability favors the driver's takeover of the vehicle in an emergency.
作者 郑新夷 朱圆圆 杨艳群 翁高悦 ZHENG Xinyi;ZHU Yuanyuan;YANG Yanqun;WENG Gaoyue(School of Humanities and Social Sciences,Fuzhou University,Fuzhou 350108,China;College of Civil Engineering,Fuzhou University,Fuzhou 350108,China)
出处 《心理技术与应用》 2024年第7期412-424,共13页 Psychology(Techniques and Applications)
基金 福建省社会科学基金项目“女司机刻板印象威胁心理机制及行为偏离矫正”(FJ2021B063)。
关键词 自动驾驶 驾驶接管 接管绩效 模糊数学 autonomous driving takes over take over performance fuzzy math
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献78

  • 1徐森泉,胡志根,刘全,黄河,蒲建平.基于熵权的导流标准多目标决策分析[J].中国农村水利水电,2004(8):45-47. 被引量:31
  • 2罗跃嘉,Raja Parasuraman.早期ERP效应与视觉注意空间等级的脑调节机制[J].心理学报,2001,33(5):385-389. 被引量:22
  • 3赵德勇,宋辉.基于熵权的改进型多指标综合评估方法及应用[J].军械工程学院学报,2001,13(3):47-51. 被引量:32
  • 4朱林,吕宏兴.地面水水质的模糊综合评价[J].西北水资源与水工程,1994,5(2):27-33. 被引量:21
  • 5Briggs, K. E., & Martin, E H. (2009). Affective picture processing and motivational relevance: Arousal and valence effects on ERPs in an oddball task. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 72, 299-306.
  • 6Carver, C. S. (2003). Pleasure as a sign you can attend to something else: Placing positive feelings within a general model of affect. Cognition and Emotion, 17, 241-261.
  • 7Chiew, K. S., & Braver, T. S. (2011). Positive affect versus reward: Emotional and motivational influences on cognitive control. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 279.
  • 8Compton, R. J., Wirtz, D., Pajoumand, G., Claus, E., & Heller,W. (2004). Association between positive affect and attentional shifting. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 28, 733-744.
  • 9Demanet, J., Liefooghe, B., Verbruggen, F. (2011). Valence, arousal, and cognitive control: A voluntary task-switching study. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 336.
  • 10Dreisbach, G. (2006). How positive affect modulates cognitive control: The costs and benefits of reduced maintenance capability. Brain and Cognition, 60, 11-19.

共引文献468

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部