合同诈骗罪与合同欺诈关于“非法占有目的”问题的解读——基于对23份裁判文书的分析

Interpretation of the“Purpose of Illegal Possession”in Contract Fraud and Contract Deception-Based on the Analysis of 23 Judgments

合同诈骗和合同欺诈行为都因其欺诈行为而危害了正常的交易秩序,不管是理论界还是实务界,对于二者之间的区分均存有争议。合同诈骗罪相对于合同欺诈来说,行为人所要承担的责任要重得多,刑法有惩罚犯罪、预防犯罪的作用,同时也要保持刑法的谦抑性。因此,对于二者的辨析就显得十分重要。不能对违法犯罪行为视而不见,也不能一味的惩罚犯罪,将公权力过多介入私法领域,影响我国经济的发展。合同诈骗和合同欺诈行为在客观表现、行为目的、法律后果等都存在不同,尤其是“非法占有目的”这一视角,是区分二者的关键所在。本文将从中国裁判文书网上搜集相关案例,运用实证方法,从案例中得出实务中的处理方法,并进行分析总结,希望可以对司法工作能有所助益。

Both contract fraud and contract deception harm normal trading order due to their fraudulent behavior.There is controversy in both theoretical and practical circles regarding the distinction between the two.Compared to contract deception,those who commit contract fraud bear much heavier responsibilities.Criminal law serves the purpose of punishing and preventing crimes while maintaining restraint.Therefore,it is crucial to distinguish between the two.We cannot turn a blind eye to illegal criminal behavior,nor can we simply punish crime excessively,as excessive intervention of public power into private law may affect the development of our country’s econo-my.Contract fraud and contract deception differ in objective performance,behavioral purposes,legal consequences,etc.,especially from the perspective of“purpose of illegal possession,”which is a key factor in distinguishing between them.This paper will collect relevant cases from the Chi-nese judgment website using empirical methods to derive practical handling methods from these cases for analysis and summary with hopes that it can be beneficial for judicial work.