摘要
英美法系适用于谋杀罪指控的挑衅抗辩因其司法实践中展现的性别歧视、对女性特质的忽略及理性自然人标准判定的困难而饱受争议。但从理论根据看,部分宽恕说认为被挑衅者的主观应受谴责性较小,部分正当说认为受挑衅而杀人者的客观错误较小,故挑衅抗辩的存在有一定正当性。本文建议,中国应当借鉴英美法系地区针对挑衅抗辩作出系列改革,将挑衅情节加入法定量刑情节之中,并明文规定挑衅抗辩的适用条件。
Though the provocation defense in the Anglo-American law system was criticized for its sexual discrimination,ignorance of women characteristics and the difficulties in the definition of the reasonable man's test.From the theoretical perspective,the partial forgiveness theory believes that the subjective condemnability of the provoked person is relatively small,while the partial justification the-ory believes that the objective error of the provoked person who kills is relatively small.Therefore,the existence of provocation defenses has a certain legitimacy.This article suggests that China should learn from the series of reforms made in the Anglo American legal system to address provocative defenses,incorporate provocative circumstances into statutory sentencing circumstances and explicitly stipulate the conditions for the application of provocative defenses.
作者
杨柠潞
Yang Ningu(Civil Aviation Flight University of China,Guanghan 618307 Sichuan China)
出处
《中国民航飞行学院学报》
2024年第4期75-80,共6页
Journal of Civil Aviation Flight University of China
