期刊文献+

督导评估中的学校发展规划:现实困境及形成机制

School Development Planning in Supervision and Evaluation:Realistic Dilemmas and Formation Mechanisms
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于学校发展规划制定、执行和评估三个关键节点,指出学校发展规划的三重困境:一是规划制订面临行政压力下的目标设定,二是规划执行中的低过程约束,三是规划评估中的高目标约束。基于压力型体制理论搭建了“结构-行为-绩效”的结构化解释框架,从学校处于压力型体制末端、主体行为与职能的分离以及“被指标治理的陷阱”等三方面剖析了困境形成的机制,并提出纾解之策以实现学校发展规划问责与改进的双重价值。 Based on the three key elements of school development planning,implementation and evaluation,the paper points out the threefold dilemma of school development planning:first,the goal setting under administrative pressure in planning;second,the low process constraints in planning implementation;third,the high goal constraints in planning evaluation.Based on the"pressure-type system theory",a structural interpretation framework of"structure-behavior-performance"is built,and the mechanism of dilemma formation is analyzed from three aspects:the school is at the end of the pressure-type system,the separation of subject behavior and function,and the"trap of index governance".In order to break through the practical dilemma of school development planning,the following three aspects of mitigation measures are proposed to achieve the dual value of school development planning accountability and improvement:first,the concept update:from problem solving to appreciation inquiry;second,the professionalization of inspection team:from"taking office"to"competence";third,the index optimization:strengthening the process attribute of school development planning.
作者 张琦 ZHANG Qi(Shanghai Sanxin School Songjiang Sixian Branch Campus,Shanghai 201620)
出处 《上海教育评估研究》 2024年第3期13-18,共6页 Shanghai Journal of Educational Evaluation
关键词 压力型体制 学校发展规划 困境 Pressurized system School development planning Dilemma
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献63

  • 1石中英.教师职业倦怠的一种哲学解释[J].中国教育学刊,2020,0(1):95-98. 被引量:54
  • 2朱光磊,张志红.“职责同构”批判[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,42(1):101-112. 被引量:737
  • 3褚宏启.政府与学校的关系重构[J].教育科学研究,2005(1):41-45. 被引量:56
  • 4彼得·德鲁克.卓有成效的管理者[M].许是祥,译.北京:机械工业出版社,2009.
  • 5彼得·德鲁克.管理的实践[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2009.
  • 6张兆勤,白天佑,胡文斌.学校发展计划指南[M].北京:教育科学出版社.
  • 7Hargreaves A. H. & Hopkins D. The empowered school: the management and practice of development planning[M]. London: CasseU Educational Limited villiers House. 1991:3-4.
  • 8登哈特J.V.,登哈特R.B.新公共服务:服务,而不是掌舵[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2010.
  • 9Ofsted. The Framework for School Inspection in England under Section 5 of the Education Act 2005, from September 2009 [Z]. London: Ofsted, 2009.
  • 10郑彩国.教师专业发展的阶段划分及其知识转型[J].教育探索,2007(11):74-75. 被引量:37

共引文献69

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部