期刊文献+

乡村振兴绩效评价指标体系构建与评价方法——基于自适应语言加权聚合算子

Construction and Evaluation Method of Performance Evaluation Index System for Rural Revitalization:Based on the Adaptive Linguistic Weighted Aggregation Operators
下载PDF
导出
摘要 由于决策环境的复杂性以及人类思维的模糊性,人们往往会面对的语言信息多属性决策问题。为解决这一问题,我们给出一种基于自适应语言加权聚合算子的多准则决策方法,该方法可以在决策评价过程中如何降低认知偏差等因素给属性权重的可靠性和稳定性带来的影响。为此,首先提出了在新的语言集下多准则决策的聚合算子,包括语言加权几何平均算子和语言加权算术平均算子。在此基础上,针对区间变量构成的不确定语言信息集,提出一种自适应语言加权算术平均决策方法。最后利用该方法判断乡村振兴绩效优劣的合理性和实用性。 Due to the complexity of the decision-making environment and the ambiguity of human thinking,people often face multi-attribute decision-making problems with linguistic information.To address this issue,the paper proposes a multi criteria decision-making method based on adaptive language weighted aggregation operators,which can reduce the impact of cognitive biases and other factors on the reliability and stability of attribute weights in the decision-making evaluation process.To this end,an aggregation operator for multi criteria decision-making in a new language set was first proposed,including the language weighted geometric mean operator and the language weighted arithmetic mean operator.On this basis,an adaptive language weighted arithmetic mean decision-making method is proposed for uncertain linguistic information sets composed of interval variables.Finally,the rationality and practicality of using this method to assess the performance of rural revitalization.
作者 王雪莹 刘晓婉 施明华 WANG Xueying;LIU Xiaowan;SHI Minghua(School of Finance and Mathematics,West Anhui University,Lu'an 237012,China)
出处 《皖西学院学报》 2024年第3期102-108,共7页 Journal of West Anhui University
基金 安徽省高校哲学社会科学重大项目(2022AH040240) 安徽省社会科学创新发展研究重大课题(2023ZD008) 皖西学院校级社科重点项目(WXSK202266) 金融与数学学院六安农商银行实践教育基地(wxxy2021085) 皖西学院科研创新平台专项(WXSK202321)。
关键词 乡村振兴 多准则决策 加权算术平均算子 自适应 rural revitalization multi criteria decision-making weighted arithmetic mean operator adaptive
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献89

  • 1刘华云,耿旭.基于可拓评价法的公共部门绩效评估:适用性、主要步骤及应用[J].系统科学学报,2020,28(1):88-92. 被引量:1
  • 2张卫华,赵铭军.指标无量纲化方法对综合评价结果可靠性的影响及其实证分析[J].统计与信息论坛,2005,20(3):33-36. 被引量:154
  • 3徐南荣 仲伟俊.科学决策理论与方法[M].南京:东南大学出版社,1996.2-10.
  • 4Hwang C L, Yoon KS. Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications[M]. Berlin. Springer, 1981. 1-50.
  • 5Yook K. The propagation of errors in multiple-attribute decision analysis: a practical approach [J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1989, 40:681 - 686.
  • 6Bryson N, Mobolurin A. An action learning evaluation procedure for multiple criteria decision making problems [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1996, 96: 379- 386.
  • 7Kyung S L, Kyung S P, Yun S E, et al. Extended methods for identifying dominance and potential optimality in multi-criteria analysis with imprecise information [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 134: 379- 386.
  • 8陈埏.决策分析[M].北京:科学出版社,1987.172-207.
  • 9Hung W L,Wu J W.Correlation of intuitionistic fuzzy sets by centroid method[J].Information Sciences,2002,144(1-4):219-225.
  • 10Mondal T K,Samanta S K.Topology of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2001,119(3):483-494.

共引文献368

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部