摘要
东汉高诱提出墨子里籍鲁人说,至清分化为西鲁说和东鲁说.前者为清嘉庆时毕沅所持,后者为孙诒让在清末提出.西鲁指楚鲁阳,即今河南鲁山.东鲁谓鲁国即今山东曲阜.20世纪80年代,山东社科院原院长刘蔚华撰文主张西鲁说,山东大学张知寒教授又提出滕州说.台湾学术界研究墨子学者冯成荣出版有关墨学著作六部,比较了墨子里籍之东西鲁说,认为东鲁说不够周严,很难成立;滕州说是空穴来风,不辨菽麦;西鲁说论据充分,令人信服.
In East Han Dynasty Gao You Proposed that Motse's hometown was in Lu. In Qing Dynasty two versions appeared,in Jiaqingperiod Bi Ruan thought Motse's hometown was in western Lu,in Late Qing period Sun Yirang put forward the Eastern Lu version. The westen Lu was referred to Lu Yang in Kingdom Chu,namely Lushan County in Henan;the Easten Lu was Kingdom Lu,now Qufu in Shandong. In 1980s,the former president of Shandong Social Sciences Academy Liu Weihua wrote an article to support the Western Lu version. Professor Zhang Zhihan of Shandong University put forward a new version 'Tengzhou'. The scholars studying Motse in Taiwan generally agreed Sun Yirang's version without concrete investigation on the spot. No one supported Tengzhou version. Taiwan scholar Feng Chengrong published six academic works about Motse school. He compared different versions and thought that Easten Lu version wasn't a detailed analysis,Tengzhou version was a rumour and Western version was convincing with sufficient grounds.
出处
《平原大学学报》
2002年第3期21-22,共2页
Journal of Pingyuan University