摘要
党的二十大报告从政治上初步构建起中国式现代化的理论体系。基于这一理论体系,可从学理上进一步建构中国式现代化的理论形态。从中国思想理论建构和意识形态建设演进角度看,中国式现代化理论形态的出场,既是遵循自身独特的历史、实践、理论逻辑的历史自觉和自主选择,也是针对“西方中心论”而作出的深刻反思和重大创新。从学理来看,这一全新的现代化理论形态,集“道路存在”“文明存在”“民族性存在”“人性存在”“社会存在”“人民性存在”“价值存在”“普惠性存在”“世界性存在”“哲学存在”为一体,彰显了这一现代化理论形态的本质特征、文明形态、民族特质、人的本质、社会治理、人民标准、共同价值、人类命运、世界贡献、哲学根基。这10个要素及其内在逻辑,不仅从学理上系统建构起了中国式现代化的理论形态,而且彰显了既区别又超越西方现代化、“西方中心论”的显著优势,还以思想的力量,在实践上引领中国式现代化发展,为人类实现现代化提供新的选择,在思想理论建设上进一步巩固中华民族的文化主体性。
The report of the Twentieth National Congress of the CPC has initially constructed a theoretical form of Chinese-style modernization from a political point of view.From the perspective of China's ideological and theoretical construction and the evolution of its ideology,the emergence of the theoretical form of Chinesestyle modernization is not only a historical self-consciousness and an independent choice following its own unique historical,practical and theoretical logic,but also a profound reflection and a major innovation in response to“West-centrism”.From a theoretical point of view,this brand-new modernization theory is a combination of“road existence”,“civilization existence”,“national existence”,“humanity existence”and“social existence”,“people-centeredness existence”,“value existence”,“inclusiveness existence”“worldwide existence”,and“philosophical existence”as an integral whole,highlighting the essential characteristics,civilization form,national characteristics,human nature,social governance,people's standards,common values,human destiny,world contribution and philosophical roots of this modernization theory form.These 10 elements and their internal logic not only systematically construct the theoretical form of Chinesestyle modernization in theoretical terms,but also highlight its significant advantage which distinguishes itself from as well as surpasses Western modernization and“West-centrism”,and lead the development of Chinese-style modernization in practice with the power of thought,providing a new choice for mankind to realize modernization,and further consolidating China's cultural subjectivity in terms of ideological and theoretical construction.
出处
《马克思主义研究》
北大核心
2024年第5期1-16,76,163,共18页
Studies on Marxism