摘要
《䂬溪诗话》经他书征引时常被称作“黄常明诗话”,与一般的诗话异名不同,这种称名与“䂬溪诗话”往往在一部典籍内同时出现。考察《杜诗详注》等书对《䂬溪诗话》的称引可见,归属在两种称名下的条目固定且不混用,两种称名显得不像在指代同部书籍。由此追踪“黄常明诗话”的形成过程,发现书商托名的《诗话总龟后集》为了掩盖拼凑作伪的痕迹,首先创造了“黄常明”等称名,后来《诗人玉屑》等汇编诗话将其统一为“黄常明诗话”,并在众多近世诗学书籍中得到延续。此案例充分说明,过往学界不甚重视的伪书《诗话总龟后集》,在近世社会真实的书籍制作语境与士人阅读生态中具有难以忽略的影响。
When the"Gongxi Shi Hua"is cited in other books,it is often referred to as"Huang Changming Shi Hua",which differs from the general synonymity of books with different names and this title often appears in combination with"Gongxi Shi Hua"in one text.An examination of the references of"Gongxi Shi Hua"in"Du Shi Xiang Zhu"and other books reveals that the entries attributed under both names are fixed and not mixed,and the two names do not appear to denote the same book.Exploring the formation process of"Huang Changming Shi Hua",it becomes evident that the editors of'Shi Hua Zong Gui Hou Ji'created the name'Huang Changming'to conceal their forgery.Subsequently,compilations such as'Shi Ren Yu Xie'united them as'Huang Changming Shi Hua',a designation adopted by many later dynastic works.This demonstrates that the previously overlooked spurious book,‘Shi Hua Zong Gui Hou Ji',played an important role in shaping both actual book production and intellectual discourse among literati in late-ancient society.
出处
《理论界》
2024年第6期83-89,共7页
Theory Horizon
关键词
䂬溪诗话
诗话总龟后集
同书异名
引文体例
传播阅读
Gongxi Shi Hua
Shi Hua Zong Gui Hou Ji
same book with different names
citation style
circulation andreading