语用动机视域下韩国总统竞选辩论中的冲突话语研究

A Study on Conflict Talk in Korean Presidential Debates through the Motivation Model of Pragmatics

冲突是大选辩论机构语境中常见的不礼貌现象。本研究基于语用动机理论,聚焦韩国第20届总统竞选的辩论文本,探讨候选人在语用动机驱动下所采取的冲突话语策略和塑造的形象特征,并对其语用动机的作用内涵进行阐释。研究发现,李在明在冲突策略的运用上更偏向攻击性,多采用异议、指责和请求策略等;尹锡悦更多采用防御策略,包括否认、反问、反对/反驳等。在“创建、维护和提高自我公众形象”的动机驱使下,李在明和尹锡悦都倾向通过刻画对方的消极形象来巩固自身权益,间接凸显己方积极形象。

Conflict is a common impolite phenomenon in the context of presidential debates.This paper is based on the motivation model of pragmatics,focuses on the debate texts of the 20th presidential election in Korea.It explores the conflict talk strategies and image features that candidates adopt under pragmatic motivation,and explains the connotation of their pragmatic motivation.Findings reveal that Lee Jae-myung tends to employ more aggressive conflict strategies,utilizing dissent,accusation,and request strategies,while Yoon Suk-yeol leans towards defensive strategies,including denial,questioning,and opposition/refutation.Motivated by the motivation of“creating,maintaining,and enhancing public image of self”,both Lee Jae-myung and Yoon Suk-yeol tend to consolidate their own rights by portraying negative images of the opponent,indirectly highlighting their positive images.