期刊文献+

多学科协作与案例导向学习组合教学方法与传统教学模式下的住院医师规范化培训学员影像诊断能力比较 被引量:1

Comparison of imaging diagnosis ability between multi-disciplinary team and case-based learning combined teaching method and traditional teaching mode in standardized training of residents
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较多学科协作(MDT)与案例导向学习(CBL)组合教学方法与传统教学模式下的住院医师规范化培训学员影像诊断能力。方法招募在西安交通大学第一附属医院接受住院医师规范化培训的60名学员,采用电脑随机分组法将其分为MDT-CBL组及传统教学组,各30人。MDT-CBL组接受MDT-CBL组合教学方法,传统教学组接受传统教学模式。比较两组学员的测验分数、能力自评量表评分及反馈问卷评分。结果MDT-CBL组的期中、期末测验总分及理论知识、案例分析得分高于传统教学组(P<0.001)。在期中和期末的能力自评中,MDT-CBL组的自学能力、临床思维能力、通科思维能力、团队合作能力、批判性思维能力、医患沟通技巧、影像诊断能力评分高于传统教学组(P<0.05)。MDT-CBL组的合理有效性、学习动力激发情况、趣味性及心理压力情况评分高于传统教学组(P<0.001)。结论MDT-CBL组合教学方法可以更好地提高住院医师规范化培训学员的影像诊断能力。 Objective To compare the imaging diagnostic ability of residents in standardized training under multi-disciplinary team(MDT)and case-based learning(CBL)combined teaching method and traditional teaching mode.Methods Sixty trainees who received standardized training of residents in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University were recruited and divided into MDT-CBL group and traditional teaching group by computer random grouping method,with 30 people in each group.The MDT-CBL group received the MDT-CBL combined teaching method,and the traditional teaching group received the traditional teaching mode.The test scores,ability self-rating scale scores and feedback questionnaire scores of the two groups were compared.Results The total scores,theoretical knowledge and case analysis of mid-term and final tests in the MDT-CBL group were higher than those in the traditional teaching group(P<0.001).In the mid-term and final self-assessment of abilities,the scores of self-study ability,clinical thinking ability,general thinking ability,teamwork ability,critical thinking ability,doctor-patient communication skills and imaging diagnosis ability in the MDT-CBL group were higher than those in the traditional teaching group(P<0.05).The scores of reasonable effectiveness,learning motivation,interest and psychological stress in the MDT-CBL group were higher than those in the traditional teaching group(P<0.001).Conclusion The MDT-CBL combined teaching method can better improve the imaging diagnosis ability of residents in standardized training.
作者 陶润仪 高山 刘博豪 陈喆 黄嘉琪 李益行 王芝馀 张广健 TAO Runyi;GAO Shan;LIU Bohao;CHEN Zhe;HUANG Jiaqi;LI Yixing;WANG Zhiyu;ZHANG Guangjian(Thoracic Surgery Department,the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University,Xi'an 710061,China;Key Laboratory of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery of Intergrated Chinese and Western Medicine,the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University,Xi'an 710061,China)
出处 《临床医学研究与实践》 2024年第20期177-180,共4页 Clinical Research and Practice
基金 西安交通大学第一附属医院教学改革研究项目(No.JG2023-0203)。
关键词 多学科协作 案例导向学习 传统教学模式 住院医师规范化培训 影像诊断 multi-disciplinary team case-based learning traditional teaching mode standardized training of resident imaging diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献35

  • 1Department of Health. National service framework for diabetes: standards. London: DH, 2001.
  • 2Department of Health. National service framework for older people. London : DH, 2001.
  • 3National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in adults in primary and secondary care. NICE, 2004.
  • 4Department of Health. Coronary heart disease: national service framework for coronary heart disease-modern standards and service models. London: DH, 2000.
  • 5Department of Health. Policy framework for commissioning cancer services: a report by the expert advisory group on cancer to the chief medical officers of England and Wales. London: DH, 1995.
  • 6Richards MA, Bantu M, Dowsett M. Provision of breast services in the UK: the advantages of specialist breast units. British Breast Group, 1994.
  • 7Cancer Guidance Sub-Group of the Clinical Outcomes Group. Improving outcomes in breast cancer. London: DH, 1996.
  • 8National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Guidance on cancer services: improving outcomes for people with brain and other CNS tumours. NICE, 2006.
  • 9Department of Health. The manual for cancer services. London: DH, 2004.
  • 10National Cancer Action Team. National cancer peer review programme 2004- 2007. National report: an overview of the findings from the second national round of peer reviews of cancer services in England. NCAT, 2008.

共引文献39

同被引文献19

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部