摘要
我国民事诉讼法司法解释有其历史必然性与现实必要性,在推进中国式程序法治现代化进程中发挥了重要作用。但在一定程度上存在替代立法型、突破立法型、权力争夺型、限制诉权型与自我减压型司法解释。作为裁判规则的民事诉讼法司法解释需要严格以法律为依据,不得违反和超越法律规定。治理民事诉讼法司法解释“乱象”需要综合施策,当前需要建立司法解释自我监督的常态化清理机制;强化权力机关监督备案审查的效力,建立权力机关对司法解释的硬约束;构建权利主体监督的司法解释附带审查机制,通过个案审理监督司法解释,逐步形成司法解释权的自我监督、权力监督和权利监督体系。
The judicial interpretation system of China's civil procedure law has its historical inevitability and practical necessity,and has significantly contributed to the modernization of China's procedural legal system.Nonetheless,to a certain extent,there are alternative legislation type,breakthrough legislation type,power struggle type,restriction of the right of action type,self-reduced pressure type of judicial interpretations.Judicial interpretation of civil procedure law as a rule of law must be strictly based on the law,and shall not violate or exceed the legal provisions.To address the'chaos'in judicial interpretation of civil procedure law,it is necessary to take comprehensive measures and improve the self-supervision of the judicial interpretation of the regular clean-up mechanism;to strengthen the effectiveness of the record review of the supervision of the power agencies,and to establish a hard constraint on the judicial interpretation by the power agencies;to establish an incidental review mechanism of judicial interpretation for citizens to activate the subject of rights to review the judicial interpretations and gradually cultivating a system of self-supervision,power supervision,and rights supervision for judicial interpretation authority.
出处
《法治研究》
北大核心
2024年第4期45-58,共14页
Research on Rule of Law
基金
国家社会科学基金项目“司法解释权的监督制约体系研究”(项目编号:23BFX022)阶段性成果
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助。
关键词
司法解释权
立法权
检察权
诉权
备案审查
附带审查
司法解释清理
judicial interpretation power
legislative power
prosecutorial power
litigation power
record review
incidental review
judicial interpretation clean-up