直视人工流产和B超导视人工流产的效果比较

Comparison of the effects of direct vision induced abortion and ultrasound guided induced abortion

目的探讨直视人工流产和B超导视人工流产的效果。方法选取本院进行无痛人流手术治疗的200例患者为研究对象。按照随机数字表法分为两组,各100例。对照组实施B超导视人工流产手术,研究组实施直视人工流产手术,比较两组患者的手术治疗指标、术后恢复指标与并发症发生情况。结果研究组手术操作时间与对照组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。研究组的术中出血量、宫腔吸引次数均少于对照组(P<0.05)。研究组术后阴道流血时间、腹痛时间与月经恢复时间均短于对照组(P<0.05)。研究组术后并发症发生率为2.00%,低于对照组的10.00%(P<0.05)。结论直视人工流产相较于B超导视人工流产,其对于患者的手术创伤更低,更利于患者术后的恢复,术后并发症更低,值得推广。

Objective To explore the effects of direct vision induced abortion and B-ultrasound guided induced abortion.Methods 200 patients who underwent painless abortion surgery in our hospital were selected as the research subjects.Divide into two groups using a random number table method,with 10o0 cases in each group.The control group underwent B-ultrasound guided induced abortion surgery,while the study group underwent direct vision induced abortion surgery.The surgical treatment indicators,postoperative recovery indicators,and incidence of complications were analyzed and compared between the two groups of patients.Results There was no statistically significant difference in surgical operation time between the study group and the control group(P>0.05).The intraoperative bleeding volume and number of uterine cavity suction in the study group were lower than those in the control group(P<0.05).The study group had shorter postoperative vaginal bleeding time,abdominal pain time,and menstrual recovery time compared to the control group(P<0.05).The incidence of postoperative complications in the study group was 2.00%,lower than the control group's 10.00%(P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with B-ultrasound guided abortion,direct vision induced abortion has lower surgical trauma for patients,is more conducive to postoperative recovery,and has lower postoperative complications.It is worth promoting.