期刊文献+

智能化时代刑事证据制度的变革与应对

Criminal Evidence System Reform and Response in the Smart Era
下载PDF
导出
摘要 伴随信息科技、人工智能的飞速发展,智能化时代已经成为可预见的现实。在刑事司法领域,我国公检法机关已经进行智能化转型实践,智慧公安、智慧检务、智能审判已经成为科技司法改革的闪亮名片。智能科技推动下的刑事证据制度变革研究已然成为前瞻性热点话题,可对证据法治发展起到指引性作用。通过分析证据制度历史沿革及其变革动因,不难洞见科技发展在推动人类认识水平与制度变革中的决定性作用。智能化时代刑事证据制度将呈现证据信息数据化、数据分析证明科学化、证明标准信息量化以及裁判智能化的基本特征。因应证据制度智能化变革的紧迫现实,我们需要贯彻权利保障完善优先于技术应用发展,建立并完善技术监督机制,树立人性优先、智能为辅等基本原则,培养交叉学科法律人才。 With the rapid development of information technology and artificial intelligence the Smart Era has become a predictable reality.In the field of criminal justice China's public security,procuratorate and court agencies have carried out smart transformation practice,and smart policing,smart prosecution and smart trials have become the shining name cards for technological judicial reform.The reform of criminal evidence system under the driving-force of smart technology is a hot topic of research,serving as guide for evidence law ruling development.Through an analysis of the historic change and motivations concerned regarding the evidence system,we can find that scientific and technological development has played a decisive role in pushing forward the level of human understanding and the system reform.In the Smart Era the criminal evidence system will demonstrate the basic features of data-based evidence information,scientific data analysis proving,quantified proof standard information and smart judgment.In response to the smart reform urgency of evidence system,we must prioritize the improvement of rights guarantee over the technological application development,establish and enhance the technology-monitoring mechanism,erect the basic principle of human-prioritization and smart-complementation,and cultivate interdisciplinary law talents.
作者 吕泽华 邓红林 LV Zehua;DENG Honglin
出处 《贵州民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2024年第3期177-192,共16页 Journal of Guizhou Minzu University:Philosophy and Social Science
基金 2021年度最高人民检察院检察理论研究课题“强化海洋检察监督机制推进海洋强国战略”(GJ2021C04) 2019年教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“量刑证明庭审实质化问题研究”(19YJA820033)阶段性成果。
关键词 人工智能 刑事证据 证明方式 裁判模式 artificial intelligence criminal evidence proof manner judgment model
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

共引文献754

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部