期刊文献+

腹腔镜下前列腺癌根治术联合保留最大尿道长度和膀胱颈的尿道重建术治疗高危前列腺癌的早期控尿和控瘤效果

Laparoscopic surgery for high-risk prostate cancer:urinary and oncologic outcomes of vesicourethral anastomosis with maximal urethral length and bladder neck preservation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨联合施行保留最大尿道长度(MULP)和膀胱颈(BNP)的尿道重建术与腹腔镜下前列腺癌根治术(LRP)或机器人辅助腹腔镜下前列腺癌根治术(RALP)治疗高危前列腺癌(HRPC)的早期控尿及控瘤效果。方法回顾性分析上海交通大学医学院附属第六人民医院泌尿外科2022年5月—2024年1月收治的23例HRPC患者的临床资料,所有患者均行LRP(包括RALP),并采用联合MULP和BNP的尿道重建技术。收集并分析患者的术前基线资料包括年龄、身体质量指数、临床T分期、Gleason评分、前列腺重量和体积、前列腺特异性抗原;术中变量包括手术方式、手术时间、术中出血量和术中输血患者数;术后变量包括住院时间、尿管留置时间、切缘阳性数、生化复发数、并发症发生率及术后早期尿控率。结果所有患者均顺利完成手术,无中转开放。手术时间(108±31)min,出血量(112±45)mL,无患者术中输血,住院时间(5.5±1.5)d,尿管留置时间(12.6±1.8)d。术后拔除尿管即刻及1、3、6个月的控尿率分别为39.1%、65.2%、73.9%和91.3%。术后2例患者切缘阳性,均为血管神经束切缘。术后无患者出现尿路梗阻或尿瘘等手术相关并发症。结论联合MULP和BNP的尿道重建术在HRPC患者行LRP治疗中可在不增加控瘤风险的前提下,有效提高患者的早期控尿率,改善患者的术后生活质量。 Objective To explore the application value of vesicourethral anastomosis with maximal urethral length preservation(MULP)and bladder neck preservation(BNP)in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy(LRP)or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy(RALP)for high-risk prostate cancer(HRPC)in terms of early urinary continence and oncology.Methods Clinical data of 23 HRPC patients who underwent LRP(including RALP)with MULP and BNP in our hospital during May 2022 and Jan.2024 were retrospectively analyzed.Patients'basic information,surgical parameters,postoperative complications,oncological outcomes and urinary incontinence were collected and analyzed.Results All operations were completed successfully without conversion to open surgery.The operation time was(108±31)min,average blood loss(112±45)mL,hospital stay(5.5±1.5)days,urethral catheterization time(12.6±1.8)days,and no patient received blood transfusion during operation.The urinary continence rates at the time of catheter removal,and at 1,3,and 6 months after surgery were 39.1%,65.2%,73.9%,and 91.3%,respectively.Two patients had positive margins,both of which were at the neurovascular bundle.No patient developed surgery-related complications,urinary obstruction or fistula after surgery.Conclusion Vesicourethral anastomosis with MULP and BNP in LRP for HRPC can effectively improve patients"early urinary continence rate and postoperative quality of life without increasing the oncological risk.
作者 郑坤 胡晓勇 傅强 李望 王营 曹乃龙 陈加生 杨冉星 ZHENG Kun;HU Xiaoyong;FU Qiang;LI Wang;WANG Ying;CAO Naiong;CHEN Jiasheng;YANG Ranxing(Department of Urology,Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine,Shanghai 200233,China)
出处 《现代泌尿外科杂志》 CAS 2024年第7期612-616,共5页 Journal of Modern Urology
关键词 前列腺癌 腹腔镜下前列腺癌根治术 机器人辅助腹腔镜下前列腺癌根治术 尿控 最大尿道长度 膀胱颈 膀胱尿道吻合术 尿道重建术 prostate cancer laparoscopic radical prostatectomy robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence maximal urethral length bladder neck vesicourethral anastomosis urethral reconstruction
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献39

  • 1南宁,陈琦,雒启东.腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术中膀胱颈完整保留对术后尿控及性功能的影响[J].微创泌尿外科杂志,2021(6):407-410. 被引量:3
  • 2Gronberg H. Prostate cancer epidemiology. Lancet, 2003, 361 : 859-864.
  • 3Khoder WY, Trottmann M, Stuber A, et al. Early incontinence after radical prostatectomy: a community based retrospective analysis in 911 men and implications for preoperative counseling [ J/OL]. Urol Oncol, 2011 [2012-05-05 ]. http://dx, doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. urolonc. 2011. 10. 003. [ published online ahead of print November 21, 2011 ].
  • 4McElveen TL, Waterman FM, Kim H, et al. Factors predicting for urinary incontinence after prostate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2004, 59: 1395-1404.
  • 5Stolzenburg J, Kallidonis P, Hicks J, et al. Effect of bladder neck preservation during endoscopic extraperitoneal radical pros- tatectomy on urinary continence. Urol Int, 2010, 85: 135-138.
  • 6Sehuessler WW, Sehulam PG, Clayman RV, et al. Laparoseopic radical prostateetomy: initial short-term experience. Urology, 1997, 50 : 854-857.
  • 7Freire MP, Weinberg AC, Lei Y, et al. Anatomic bladder neck preservation during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatec- tomy: description of technique and outcomes. Eur Urol, 2009, 56 : 972-980.
  • 8Parsons JK, Marschke P, Maples P, et al. Effect of methylpred- nisolone on return of sexual function after nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology, 2004, 64: 987-990.
  • 9Anastasiadis AG, Salomon L, Katz R, et al. Radical retropubic versus laparoscopic prostatectomy: a prospective comparison of functional outcome. Urology, 2003, 62: 292-297.
  • 10Carlsson S, Aus G, Bergdahl S, et al. The excess burden of side-effects from treatment in men allocated to screening for pros- tate cancer. The Goteborg randomised population-based prostate cancer screening trial. Eur J Cancer, 2011,47 : 545-553.

共引文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部