可弯曲负压鞘联合一次性输尿管软镜与超微经皮肾镜治疗2~3 cm肾结石的疗效比较

Efficacy of flexible negative pressure ureteral access sheath plus disposable flexible ureteroscope versus SMP in the treatment of 2-3 cm renal calculi

目的 探讨可弯曲负压输尿管软镜鞘(UAS)联合一次性输尿管软镜(FURS)与超微经皮肾镜(SMP)治疗2~3 cm肾结石的治疗效果,为结石患者的治疗选择提供参考。方法 回顾性分析2021年9月—2023年9月于福建中医药大学附属厦门市第三医院行手术治疗的130例2~3 cm肾结石患者的资料,其中采用可弯曲负压UAS联合一次性FURS取石术者68例(UAS联合组),采用SMP者62例(SMP组),比较两组围手术期主要数据指标及术后清石率(SFR)。结果 两组手术均顺利完成,UAS联合组与SMP组术后3 d(88.24%vs.90.32%)及1个月(91.18%vs.93.55%)的总SFR、并发症发生率(5.88%vs.9.67%)比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。对于肾盂肾下盏夹角(IPA)<45°的下盏结石患者,UAS联合组SFR明显低于SMP组(57.14%vs.100%,P<0.05)。UAS联合组较SMP组的手术时间更长[(104.94±8.79)min vs.(77.98±6.60)min,P<0.001]、住院费用更高[(23 112.82±1 152.34)元vs.(21 975.84±1 512.24)元,P<0.001],术后血红蛋白下降值更少[(6.71±2.07)g/L vs.(9.81±4.80)g/L,P<0.001]、术后住院时间更短[(3.28±0.51)d vs.(5.58±0.71)d,P<0.001]。UAS联合组术后6、24、48 h视觉模拟评分(VAS)[(6.38±0.69)、(3.62±0.73)、(3.12±0.33)分]均小于SMP组[(7.87±0.88)、(5.81±0.83)、(3.81±0.60)分],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 对于2~3 cm肾结石两种手术方式均具有较高的SFR,SMP具有手术时间短、住院费用低、下盏结石SFR高等优势,而可弯曲负压UAS联合一次性FURS取石术具有出血少、痛苦小、术后住院时间短等优势。术者可以根据患者病情及其意愿,结合自身经验选择合适的手术方式。

Objective To explore the efficacy of negative pressure ureteral access sheath combined with disposable flexible ureteroscope(UAS+FRUS)in the treatment of renal calculi of 2-3 cm,so as to provide reference for the treatment.Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 130 cases of renal calculi of 2-3 cm treated with surgery in Xiamen Third Hospital during Sep.2021 and Sep.2023,including 68 cases with UAS+FRUS and 62 cases with super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotripsy(SMP).The perioperative indexes and stone-clearance rate(SFR)were compared between the two groups.Results All operations were successful.There were no statistically significant differences in the total SFR and incidence of complications(5.88%vs.9.67%)between the two groups 3 days(88.24%vs.90.32%)and 1 month(91.18%vs.93.55%)after surgery(P>0.05).For patients with lower calyceal calculi with infundibulopelvic angle(IPA)<45°,the SFR of the UAS+FRUS group was significantly lower than that of the SMP group(57.14%vs.100%,P<0.05).The UAS+FRUS group had a longer operation time than the SMP group[(104.94±8.79)minutes vs.(77.98±6.60)minutes,P<0.001],higher hospitalization costs[(23112.82±1152.34)yuan vs.(21975.84±1512.24)yuan,P<0.001],less postoperative decrease in hemoglobin[(6.71±2.07)g/L vs.(9.81±4.80)g/L,P<0.001],and shorter postoperativehospitalization time[(3.28±0.51)d vs.(5.58±o.71)d,P<0.001].The UAS+FRUS group had lower postoperative VAS score at 6,24,and 48 hours than theSMPgroup[(6.38±0.69)vs.(7.87±0.88);(3.62±0.73)vs.(5.81±0.83)and(3.12±0.33)vs.(3.81±0.60)],with statistical significance(P<0.05).Conclusion Both surgical methods have a high SFR in the treatment of renal calculi of 2-3 cm.SMP has the advantages of short operation time,low hospitalization costs,and high SFR for lower calyx calculi,while UAS+FURS has the advantages of little bleeding,minimal trauma,and short hospital stay.Surgeons can make reasonable choices based on the patients'condition and willingness,combined with their own surgical experience.