期刊文献+

利奈唑胺诱导致命性乳酸中毒:一种极易混淆为脓毒性休克的不良反应

Linezolid-induced fatal lactic acidosiss:an adverse reaction easily confu-sed with septic shock
下载PDF
导出
摘要 回顾性分析北京、山东两所医院诊治的3例利奈唑胺诱导乳酸中毒患者的临床资料,并检索国内外相关文献,探讨其致病机制、危险因素、临床表现和治疗方案。3例患者因病情使用利奈唑胺抗感染治疗,在用药的不同阶段出现难以用脓毒性休克解释的乳酸中毒,停用利奈唑胺并给予床旁连续性静脉-静脉血液滤过治疗后,患者血乳酸水平明显下降,最终临床诊断为利奈唑胺诱导的乳酸中毒,但初诊医生均考虑为脓毒性休克。经积极治疗,2例患者转归良好,1例患者死亡。利奈唑胺诱导的乳酸中毒易被误诊为脓毒性休克,广大临床医生应提高对此不良反应早期诊断的认知与识别,采取有效的治疗措施,以改善患者预后。 Clinical data of 3 patients with linezolid-induced lactic acidosis treated in 2 hospitals in Beijing and Shandong were retrospectively analyzed,and relevant literatures at home and abroad were retrieved.The pathogenesis,risk factors,clinical manifestations,and treatment scheme were valuated.Three patients received linezolid anti-infection treatment due to their disease condition.At different phases of treatment,they developed lactic acidosis that was difficult to be explained with septic shock.After discontinuing linezolid and receiving bedside continuous veno-venous hemofiltration(CVVH)treatment,patient’s blood lactate levels decreased significantly.It is clinically diagnosed linezolid-induced lactic acidosis finally,but the initial diagnosis was septic shock by all doctors.After active treatment,2 patients recovered and 1 patient died.Linezolid-induced lactic acidosis is easily to be misdiagnosed as septic shock.Clinicians should enhance their understanding and recognition of the early diagnosis of the adverse reactions,take effective measures,so as to improve patient prognosis.
作者 朱然 杨绍婉 田行瀚 李小丽 刘岩 ZHU Ran;YANG Shao-wan;TIAN Xing-han;LI Xiao-li;LIU Yan(The Second Clinical Medicine School of Binzhou Medical University,Yantai 264199,China;Department of Neurology,Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital,Yantai 264099,China;Department of Critical Care Medicine,Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital,Yantai 264099,China;Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine,China-Japan Friendship Hospital,Beijing 100029,China;Department of Infectious Diseases,Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital,Yantai 264099,China)
出处 《中国感染控制杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2024年第7期897-900,共4页 Chinese Journal of Infection Control
基金 山东省自然科学基金项目(ZR2021MH266)。
关键词 利奈唑胺 多重耐药 乳酸中毒 脓毒性休克 linezolid multidrug resistance lactic acidosis septic shock
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献59

  • 1林东昉,吴菊芳,张婴元,郑经川,缪竞智,郑丽叶,盛瑞媛,周新,沈华浩,吴卫红,周乐,汪复.利奈唑胺与万古霉素治疗革兰阳性菌感染的随机、双盲、对照、多中心临床试验[J].中国感染与化疗杂志,2009,9(1):10-17. 被引量:56
  • 2张卫珍,蔡绍曦.治疗耐药革兰阳性球菌感染的抗生素研究进展[J].中国临床药理学杂志,2007,23(3):217-222. 被引量:1
  • 3Gary French. Safety and tolerability of linezolid[ J]. Journal ofAntimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2003,51( Suppl) :45-53.
  • 4Zhang QL, Rothenbacher D. Prevalence of chronic kidney dis-ease in population-based studies: Systematic review[ J]. BMCPublic Health,2008,8:117.
  • 5National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQI clinical practice guide-lines for chronic kidney disease : evaluation,classification,andstratification[ J]. Am J Kidney Dis,2002,39:SI.
  • 6Coresh J, Selvin E, Stevens LA, et al. Prevalence of chronickidney disease in the United States [ J]. JAMA,2007 , 298 :2038-2047.
  • 7Obrador GT, Pereira BJ, Kausz AT. Chronic kidney disease inthe United States : an underrecognized problem [ J]. SeminNephrol,2002,22 :441.
  • 8Chadban SJ, Briganti E, Kerr PG, et al. Prevalence of kidneydamage in australian adults: the aus diab kidney study [ J]. JAm Soc Nephrol ,2003 ,14 : SI 31 -SI 38.
  • 9Imai E,Horio M,Iseki K,et al. Prevalence of chronic kidneydisease (CKD) in the Japanese general population predictedby the MDRD equation modified by a Japanese coefficient[J]. Clin Exp Nephrol,2007,11 : 156-163.
  • 10Zhang L,Zhang P,Wang F,et al. Prevalence and factors asso-ciated with CKD: A population study from Beijing[ J]. Am JKidney Dis,2008,51:373-384.

共引文献81

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部