期刊文献+

Fe(Ⅱ)投加时序对硫酸盐还原菌处理不同形态As或Sb的影响

Impact of Fe(Ⅱ)addition timing on the removal of different forms of As or Sb by sulfate reducing bacteria
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在硫酸盐还原菌(SRB)基质中按照不同时序加入50 mg/L Fe(Ⅱ)及不同形态的As或Sb(初始质量浓度均为5 mg/L),设计4个处理(T1,同时加入As(Ⅴ)、Sb(Ⅴ)和Fe(Ⅱ);T2,提前2 d加入Fe(Ⅱ)后再加入As(Ⅴ)、Sb(Ⅴ);T3,同时加入As(Ⅲ)、Sb(Ⅲ)和Fe(Ⅱ);T4,提前2 d加入Fe(Ⅱ)后再加入As(Ⅲ)、Sb(Ⅲ)),分析实验过程中基质pH、氧化还原电位、光密度(OD_(600))、总碱度、SO_(4)^(2-)、硫化物、Fe、As或Sb含量等随时间的变化,以明确Fe(Ⅱ)对As、Sb的去除效率及机制的影响。结果表明,在硫化物较为充足的基质中(硫化物残余量>8 mg/L),各处理7 d时Sb的去除率均可达98%以上,As的去除率则为38.42%~87.36%,实验后期基质中As、Sb出现复溶,总体上Sb较As易固化;Fe(Ⅱ)提前加入有助于As、Sb的去除,但相较于Fe(Ⅱ)的投加时序,As、Sb自身形态对去除效果的影响更为显著,As(Ⅲ)、Sb(Ⅲ)比As(Ⅴ)、Sb(Ⅴ)具有更快的去除速率和更高的去除率,14 d后T3、T4的Sb残余量低于检出限,As的残余量则分别为1.94、0.62 mg/L。因而,通过硫还原作用处理含As、Sb废水时,除了通过添加适量Fe(Ⅱ)提高去除率,还需采取适当的措施促进As、Sb还原,以取得更为显著的固化效果。 In sulfate-reducing bacteria(SRB)matrices,50 mg/L Fe(Ⅱ)and various forms of As or Sb(with initial mass concentrations of 5 mg/L)were added at different time intervals to design four treatments:T1,simultaneous addition of As(Ⅴ),Sb(Ⅴ),and Fe(Ⅱ);T2,addition of Fe(Ⅱ)two days in advance followed by As(Ⅴ)and Sb(Ⅴ);T3,simultaneous addition of As(Ⅲ),Sb(Ⅲ)and Fe(Ⅱ);T4,addition of Fe(Ⅱ)two days in advance followed by As(Ⅲ)and Sb(Ⅲ).The changes in matrix pH,redox potential,optical density(OD_(600)),total alkalinity,SO_(4)^(2-),sulfide,Fe,As and Sb content over time were analyzed to clarify the impact of Fe(Ⅱ)on the efficiency and mechanism of As and Sb removal.The results showed that in matrices with sufficient sulfide(sulfide residual>8 mg/L),the removal rate of Sb in all treatments could reach over 98%after 7 days,while the removal rate of As ranged from 38.42%to 87.36%.Re-dissolution of As and Sb occurred in the later stages of the experiment,and Sb was generally easier to be solidified than As.The prior addition of Fe(Ⅱ)was conducive to the removal of As and Sb,but the form of As and Sb had a more significant impact on the removal effect than the timing of Fe(Ⅱ)addition.As(Ⅲ)and Sb(Ⅲ)exhibited faster removal rates and higher removal rates than As(Ⅴ)and Sb(Ⅴ).After 14 days of treatment,the residual Sb in T3 and T4 was below the detection limit,while the residual As was 1.94 and 0.62 mg/L,respectively.Therefore,when treating As and Sb containing wastewater through sulfur reduction,in addition to improving the removal rate by adding an appropriate amount of Fe(Ⅱ),appropriate measures should also be taken to promote the reduction of As and Sb to achieve more significant stabilization effects.
作者 柳凤娟 张国平 罗绪强 余乐正 马超 LIU Fengjuan;ZHANG Guoping;LUO Xuqiang;YU Lezheng;MA Chao(School of Geography and Resources,Guizhou Education University,Guiyang Guizhou 550018;State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry,Institute of Geochemistry,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Guiyang Guizhou 550081;School of Chemistry and Materials Science,Guizhou Education University,Guiyang Guizhou 550018;Guizhou Institute of Mountain Resources,Guiyang Guizhou 550001)
出处 《环境污染与防治》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2024年第7期976-983,共8页 Environmental Pollution & Control
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.41563007) 贵州省基础研究计划(自然科学类)项目(黔科合基础-ZK[2022]一般330) 贵州科学院项目(黔科院R字[2021]10号、黔科院J字[2023]15号)。
关键词 硫酸盐还原菌 AS SB Fe(Ⅱ) sulfate reducing bacteria As Sb Fe(Ⅱ)
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献44

  • 1斯琴高娃,袁立娟,聂志强,徐艳燕.一种新型污水处理剂的制备及其除铅性能研究[J].内蒙古石油化工,2004,30(5):10-11. 被引量:1
  • 2刘锐平,李星,夏圣骥,武荣成,李圭白.高锰酸钾强化三氯化铁共沉降法去除亚砷酸盐的效能与机理[J].环境科学,2005,26(1):72-75. 被引量:30
  • 3国家环境保护总局 水和废水监测分析方法编委会.水和废水监测分析方法[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002..
  • 4Acharyya, S. K., Chakraborty, P., Lahiri, S., et al., 1999. Arse- nic Poisoning in the Ganges Delta.Nature, 401 (6753) : 545- 545.doi: 10.1038/44052.
  • 5Anawar, H. M., Akai, J., Sakugawa, H., 2004. Mobilization of Arsenic from Subsurface Sediments by Effect of Bicar- bonate Ions in Groundwater. Chemosphere , 54 (6) : 753- 762. doi: 10.1016/j. chemosphere. 2003.08.030.
  • 6Appelo, C. A. J., Postma, D., 2005. Geochemistry, Groundwa- ter and Pollution.CRC Press, New York.
  • 7Bauer,M., Blodau, C., 2006. Mobilization of Arsenic by Dis- solved Organic Matter from Iron Oxides, Soils and Sed- iments.Science of the Total Environment, 354 (2-3) : 179- 190. doi: 10.1016/j. scitotenv. 2005.01.027.
  • 8Butler, E.C., Hayes,tCF., 1998.Effects of Solution Composi- tion and pH on i:he Reductive Dechlorination of Hexa- chloroethane by Iron Sulfide.Environmental Science & Technology, 32 (9): 1276 - 1284. doi: 10. 1021/ es9706864.
  • 9Dong, H. R., Guan, X. H., Lo, I. M. C., 2012. Fate of As(V)- Treated Nano Zero-Valent Iron: Determination of Arse- nic Desorption Potential under Varying Environmental Conditions by Phosphate Extraction.Water Research, 46 (13) : 4071-4080. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.05.015.
  • 10Farquhar, M. L., Charnock, J. M., Livens, F. R., et al., 2002. Mechanisms of Arsenic Uptake from Aqueous Solution by Interaction with Goethite, Lepidocrocite, Mackinaw- ite, and Pyrite: An X-Ray Absorption Spectroscopy Study. Environmental Science & Technology, 36 ( 8 ) : 1757-1762.doi: 10.1021/es010216g.

共引文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部