期刊文献+

欧盟框架计划监督评估实践与启示研究

Practice and Implications of Supervision and Evaluation of E.U.Framework Programme
下载PDF
导出
摘要 欧盟框架计划在实施过程中建立了较为完善、科学的监督评估体系。结合欧盟框架计划事前、事中、事后评估实践,重点对其目的与框架、方法与实践进行了总结分析。得出结论,欧盟框架计划监督评估以推动计划顺利实施作为核心目的,通过逻辑框架厘清计划实施的内在逻辑关系,根据不同管理阶段要求合理设定评估内容。在评估过程中,充分利用已有信息基础,合理运用文献计量法、关键影响路径分析以及基线与标杆分析法等提升评估的客观性、科学性、准确性。结合中国重大科技计划实施情况,提出了完善全流程体系框架,加强定量方法应用以及健全结果反馈应用机制的有关建议,为重大科技计划监督评估体系设计提供有益借鉴和参考。 The E.U.Framework Programme has established a relatively complete and scientific monitoring and evaluation system in the process of implementation.This paper analyzes the objectives,frameworks,methods,and practices of pre-implementation,on-going,and post-implementation evaluation of the E.U.Framework Programme.It’s believed that the supervision and evaluation of the E.U.Framework Programme focuses on promoting the smooth implementation of the plan as the core objective,clarifying the internal logical relationship of plan implementation through logical framework,and reasonably setting the evaluation content according to different management stages.In the process of evaluation,it makes full use of the existing information base,and reasonably applies bibliometric analysis,key impact path analysis,baseline and benchmarking analysis,and other methods to enhance the objectivity,scientificity,and accuracy of the evaluation.Combined with the implementation of China’s major science and technology plans,this paper proposes relevant suggestions on designing evaluation activities based on different management stages,strengthening the application of quantitative evaluation methods,and enhancing the use of supervision and evaluation results,aiming to provide useful references for the construction of China’s major science and technology plan supervision and evaluation system.
作者 应益昕 王晔博 冯洁 翟岩 庞宇 YING Yixin;WANG Yebo;FENG Jie;ZHAI Yan;PANG Yu(National Center for Science&Technology Evaluation,Beijing 100081)
出处 《全球科技经济瞭望》 2024年第5期1-7,共7页 Global Science,Technology and Economy Outlook
关键词 欧盟框架计划 监督评估 重大科技计划 the E.U.Framework Programme supervision and evaluation major science and technology plan
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献36

  • 1魏海燕.科技计划的评估方法及其应用研究[J].科研管理,2007,28(z1):26-29. 被引量:18
  • 2杨多贵,周志田.关于制定《2006~2020年国家中长期科学和技术发展规划》的若干建议[J].经济研究参考,2005(33):31-41. 被引量:4
  • 3谈毅,仝允桓.政府科技计划绩效评价维度、方法及模式[J].公共管理学报,2005,2(2):63-68. 被引量:22
  • 4杨志江,罗掌华,钟优慧.政府科技计划绩效评价研究综述[J].广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007,43(2):131-134. 被引量:12
  • 5European Commission. Focus on Results: Strengthening Evaluation of Commission Activities [R/OL]. [2013-03-05]. http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/in formation society/evaluation/data/ pdf/lib_master/sec2000 1051 _strengthening_eval.pdf.
  • 6European Commission. Evaluation Standards and Good Practice [R/OL]. [2013-03-05]. http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/information_society/evaluation/data/pdf/lib_master/com2002_5267_eval_ standards.pdf.
  • 7European Commission. Responding to Strategic Needs: Reinforcing the Use of Evaluation [R/OL]. [2013-03-05]. http:// ec.europa.eu/dgs/seeretariat general/evaluation/docs/eval_ comm_sec_2007_213_en.pdf.
  • 8European Parliament & Council of the European Union. Decision No 1982/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006--Concerning the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities (2007-2013)[J]. Official Journal of the European Union, 2006-12-30, L412: 1-41.
  • 9DG RTD of the European Commission. Fifth FP7 Monitoring Report [R]. Brussels: European Commission, 2012-09-29.
  • 10DG RTD of European Commission. Annual Report on Programme Evaluation Activities 2011 [R]. Brussels: European Commission, 2012-07.

共引文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部