摘要
算法的笼罩让原本界限分明的主体客体及二者关系扑朔迷离,令责任主体的判断举棋不定。揭开算法面纱,露出隐藏的主体,以及规训僭越的客体是算法治理的关键。在一般社会活动中,算法僭越对人的主体性威胁重重,不仅会打破主体制度格局,而且将导致人的主观能动性弱化,使由此产生的风险在责任承担中逃逸。算法在公权力行使实践中,诱导使用者做出有失偏颇的决策时有发生。从算法规制部门法分工角度而言,算法对决策的作用分布在民商事、行政和刑事领域,其中民商事领域的算法僭越风险高发于消费和经营决策中,行政领域的算法僭越一般与公共服务算法决策的价值选择相关,刑事司法领域的算法僭越通常无法回避公民基本权利问题。算法僭越的归位治理可分别以治理主体、治理客体和治理过程为中心展开。结构化的算法僭越治理根据评价僭越行为部门法的不同,确定僭越的类型,匹配算法集中展现的属性,并给出归位治理的一般性原则。
The concealment of the algorithm makes the subject-object relationship of the original clear confrontation confusing,making the judgment of the subject's responsible uncertain.Unveiling the algorithm,revealing the hidden subject,and discipline the object of trespassing is the key to algorithm governance.In ordinary social activities,algorithmic trespassing threatens people's subjectivity,which will not only break the pattern of the subject system,but also lead to the weakening of people's subjective initiative,so that the resulting risks escape in the assumption of responsibility.In the practice of public power,algorithms often induce users to make biased decisions.From the perspective of the division of jurisdiction in the department of law,the role of algorithms in decision-making is distributed in the civil and commercial,administrative and criminal fields,among which the risk of algorithm trespassing in the civil and commercial field is high in consumption and business decisions,the algorithm trespass in the administrative field is related to the value selection of public service algorithm decision-making typically,and the algorithm trespass in the criminal justice field usually involves the issue of basic rights of citizens.The attribution governance of algorithmic trespassing can be centered on the governance subject,governance object and governance process.According to the different departmental laws for evaluating the trespassing behavior,the structured algorithmic encroachment governance determines the type of encroachment,matches the attribute that algorithm shows,and gives the general principles of homing governance.
出处
《法学评论》
CSSCI
北大核心
2024年第4期138-149,共12页
Law Review
基金
国家社科基金重大项目“中国特色网络内容治理体系及监管模式研究”(项目编号:18ZDA317)的阶段性成果。
关键词
算法法律
主体性
算法治理
算法越权
算法归位
Algorithm Regulation
Subjectivity
Algorithmic Governance
Trespassing of Algorithm
Algorithmic Homing