期刊文献+

分类层叠:中国政府机构改革的解释性概念——基于“结构-历史”的分析框架 被引量:2

Classification Layering:An Explanatory Concept of Chinese Government Institutional Reform——An Analytical Framework based on“Structure-History”
原文传递
导出
摘要 改革开放以来,我国进行了持续的政府机构改革,形成了政府机构改革的中国模式,但相关研究未能厘清中国政府机构改革的独特历程与改革所处结构性环境之间的深刻逻辑关联。基于历史制度主义构建“结构-历史”的分析框架,能够从一个新视角对改革开放以来中国政府的机构改革展开系统研究。改革开放以来中国政府机构改革,从结构维度来看,其处于由宏观环境、中观制度和微观行为构成的独特结构性网络之中;从历史维度来看,其在整体上属于历史制度主义定义的制度层叠,但不同改革领域采取了不同的层叠方式,对整体制度变迁进行分类调适,分别形成“层叠式结构转换”“层叠式职能转变”“层叠式路径依赖”等调适类型。整合政府机构改革的结构性分析和历史性分析揭示二者的深刻逻辑关联,可以凝练出“分类层叠”这一改革开放以来中国政府机构改革的解释性概念。 Since the reform and opening up,China has carried out continuous government institutional reform and formed a Chinese model of the government institutional reform.However,the relevant research has failed to clarify the profound logical relationship between the unique process of the government institutional reform and the structural environment of the government institutional reform.The construction of the analytical framework of“structure-history”based on historical institutionalism can make a systematic study on Chinese government institutional reform since the reform and opening up from a new perspective.From the structural dimension,the Chinese government institutional reform since the reform and opening up is in a unique structural network composed of macro environment,meso system and micro behavior.From the historical dimension,the Chinese government institutional reform since the reform and opening up belongs to the institutional layering of the definition of historical institutionalism as a whole,but different reform fields have adopted different layering ways to classify and adjust the overall institutional changes,forming the adaptation types of“layering structure transformation”,“layering function transformation”and“layering path dependence”respectively.By integrating the structural analysis and historical analysis of the government institutional reform to reveal the profound logical relationship between them,we can refine the concept of“classification layering”,which is the explanatory concept of Chinese government institutional reform since the reform and opening up.
作者 李过 LI Guo(School of Marxism,Northeastern University,Shenyang,Liaoning,110819,China;School of Marxism,Northeastern University at Qinhuangdao,Qinhuangdao,Hebei,066004,China)
出处 《行政论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2024年第3期95-104,共10页 Administrative Tribune
基金 国家社会科学基金一般项目“历史制度主义视角下的中国政府职能转变研究(1978—2018年)”(20BZZ059) 辽宁省社会科学规划基金项目“新时代中国共产党以机构改革推进中国式现代化的经验与展望研究”(L23CZZ001) 中央高校基本科研业务费项目“以政府机构改革推进中国式现代化的历史经验与现实路径研究——基于历史制度主义的视角”(N2323006)。
关键词 政府机构改革 历史制度主义 分类层叠 Government Institutional Reform Historical Institutionalism Classification Layering
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献26

  • 1田穗生.国家的两种职能及其关系[J].社会科学,1984(4):22-24. 被引量:7
  • 2邓小南.西汉官吏考课制度初探[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1987,24(2):22-27. 被引量:15
  • 3叶麒麟.打破职责同构:政府机构改革的新思路[J].学术探索,2007(2):24-28. 被引量:15
  • 4皮亚杰.倪连生、王琳译.结构主义[M].北京:商务印书馆,1986.
  • 5James Mahoney, Dietrich Rueschemeyer. Comparative His- torical Analysis : Achievement, Agendas [M] //James Maho- ney, Dietrich, Rueschemeyer. Comparative Historical Analy- sis in the Social Science. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003:7.
  • 6Peter A Hall, Rosemary C R Taylor. Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms [J], Political Studies, 1996(44) :936 -957.
  • 7Stephen Krasner. Approaches to the State [J]. Comparative Politics, 1984, 16,223-246.
  • 8[韩]河连燮著.制度分析:理论与争议[M](第二版).北京:中国人民大学出版社,2014:119—123..
  • 9Kathleen Thelen, Sven Steinmo. Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics [M]//Sven Steinmo et al. Structu- ring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative A- nalysis. New York : Cambridge University Press, 1992 : 10.
  • 10Streeck W, Kathleen Thelen. Introduction: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies [M] // W. Streeck, K. Thelen. Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2005 : 1 - 39.

同被引文献71

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部