期刊文献+

继承与发展:从国家创新系统到智慧专业化

Inheritance and development from national innovation systems to smart specialization
下载PDF
导出
摘要 20世纪70年代以来,在创新驱动发展逐渐成为世界共识的背景下,欧洲先后产生了一批重要的创新发展理论,其中国家创新系统、区域创新系统、创新集群以及智慧专业化等理论最具有代表性。这些理论在世界范围内具有广泛而深刻的影响,对推动我国创新理论与实践的进步发挥了积极作用。从国家创新系统到智慧专业化,理论与理论之间既有联系,又有区别,既有继承,又有发展。创新发展理论的演化是认知深化与实践变化的结果,在当前形势下,对这些理论的继承与发展关系进行系统分析与梳理,有助于进一步加深对创新驱动发展的理解,进一步提高区域创新发展的水平。 Since the 1970s,under the background that innovation-driven development has gradually become a global consensus,Europe has produced a number of important innovation development theories,among which national innovation system,regional innovation system,innovation cluster and intelligent specialization are the most representative theories.These theories have extensive and profound influence in the world,and play a positive role in promoting the progress of innovation theory and practice in our country.From the national innovation system to the specialization of wisdom,there are both connections and differences between theories,both inheritance and development.The evolution of innovation and development theories is the result of cognitive deepening and practical changes.Under the current situation,a systematic analysis and analysis of the relationship between inheritance and development of these theories will help to further deepen the understanding of innovation-driven development and further improve the level of regional innovation and development.
作者 黎越亚 柳婷 Li Yue-Ya;Liu Ting
出处 《生产力研究》 2024年第7期11-18,F0003,共9页 Productivity Research
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“中美战略性新兴产业竞争的‘非对称’特征识别与测度研究”(21YJCZH094)。
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献55

  • 1Abouzeedan, A. et al(2010), "Innovation and entrepreneurship: New themes for new times", Annals of Innovation Entrepreneurship 1(1).
  • 2Antonelli, C. (2009), "The economics of innovation: From the classical legacies to the economics of complexity", Economics of Innovation and New Technology 18(7): 611646.
  • 3Arthur, W. B. (1994), Increasing Returns and Path Dependency in the Economy, The University of Michigan Press.
  • 4Becker &- Knudsen(2002), "Schumpeter 1911: Farsighted visions on economic development", American Journal of Economics and Sociology 61 (2) : 387- 403.
  • 5Belloc, F. (2011), "Corporate governance and innovation& A survey", Journal of Economic Surveys 10:1-35.
  • 6Bertocco, G. (2007), "Finance and development: Is Schumpeter's analysis still relevant?", Journal of Banking & Finance 32:1161-1175.
  • 7Breschi & Malerba ( 1997), " Sectoral innovation systems Technological regimes, Schumpeterian dynamics and spatial boundaries", Systems of Innovation& Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, Pinter, London.
  • 8Camis6n g& Monfort- Mir ( 2011 ) ," Measuring innovation intourism from the Schumpeterian and the dynamic- capa- bilities perspectives", Tourism Management xxx, 1- 14.
  • 9Carayannis, E. E. (2010), "Re-visiting Schumpeter: Com petitiveness, innovation, and productivity challenges and opportunities in the 21st century".
  • 10Castellacci, F. (2007), "Evolutionary and new growth theories, Are they converging?", Journal of Economic Surveys 21(3).

共引文献64

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部