期刊文献+

改进范式下的英国高校社会服务评估探索——对“知识交换协定”的考察

An Exploration of Evaluation for University Social Service in UK Under the Improvement Paradigm:Based on the Analysis of Knowledge Exchange Concordat
原文传递
导出
摘要 为通过评估促进高校发挥社会服务职能,英国在2017年提出“知识交换框架”项目的同时,也基于评估的改进范式提出“知识交换协定”项目。从2020年到2021年,“知识交换协定”对英国高校知识交换活动展开了初始评估,项目以质量改进为根本目的,注重对知识交换活动内在机制考察,支持价值多元,促进评估者与被评估者合作共创,对英国高校知识交换的内部改进产生了显著影响。英国在改进范式下对高校社会服务的评估探索对我国加快构建完善的高校社会服务评估体系具有重要借鉴意义。 In order to promote the social service function of universities through evaluation,the UK proposed the Knowledge Exchange Framework project in 2017,and also proposed the Knowledge Exchange Concordat(KEC)project based on the improvement paradigm of evaluation.From 2020 to 2021,the KEC project has launched an initial evaluation of knowledge exchange activities in British universities.The project takes quality improvement as its fundamental purpose,focuses on the investigation of the internal mechanism of knowledge exchange activities,supports value diversification,and promotes cooperation and co-creation between evaluators and evaluation object,which has a significant impact on the internal improvement of knowledge exchange in British universities.Britain's evaluation of university social service under the improvement paradigm has great significance for our country to accelerate the construction of a perfect university social service evaluation system.
作者 马星 MA Xing(Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology,Nanjing 210044)
出处 《中国高教研究》 北大核心 2024年第7期73-79,共7页 China Higher Education Research
基金 江苏省社会科学基金一般项目“江苏高校服务区域高质量发展的创新实践与推进策略研究”(22JYB023)的研究成果。
关键词 改进范式 高校社会服务 高校评估 英国 improvement paradigm university social service university evaluation the UK
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献16

  • 1王凤鸣.英国工党的“新思维”——托尼·布莱尔思想述评[J].当代世界社会主义问题,1997(2):11-24. 被引量:10
  • 2罗伯特·K.默顿.社会理论和社会结构[M].唐少杰,齐心,等译.南京:译林出版社,2006.
  • 3EDWARDS M, HULME D. NGO Performance and Accountability[M]//EDWARDS M, HULME D. Beyond the Magic Bullet : NGO Performance and Accountability in the Post Cold War World. West Hartford, Conn. : Kumarian Press, 1996:8.
  • 4PERRIN B. Towards a New View of Accountability [M]//MARIE-LOUISE B V, LONSDALE J, PERRIN B. Making Accountability Work: Dilemmas for Evaluation and for Audit. New Brunswick, N. J. : Transaction Publishers, 2007 : 56.
  • 5STROM K. Parliamentary Democracy and Delegation [M]//STROM K,MLER W C,BERGMAN T. Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Oxford.Oxford University Press, 2003 .63.
  • 6PETERS B G. Performance-based Accountability [M]//SHAH A. Performance Accountability and Combating Corruption. Washington, D. C. : World Bank, 2007 : 20.
  • 7彼得·什托姆普卡.信任:一种社会学理论[M].程胜利,译.北京:中华书局,2005:194.
  • 8BURKE J C. The Three Corners of the Accountability Triangle: Serving All, Submitting to None[M]// BURKE J C. Achieving Accountability in Higher Education: Balancing Public, Academic, and Market Demands. San Francisco..Jossey-Bass,2005: 315-316.
  • 9青井和夫.社会学原理[M].北京:华夏出版社,2002..
  • 10L·科塞.社会冲突的功能[M].北京:华夏出版社,1989..

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部