摘要
基于长三角地区41所“双高计划”高水平学校2016-2022年建设成效面板数据,采用双重差分法评估了“双高计划”高水平学校建设的政策效应。结果显示:“双高计划”高水平学校在学生发展、师资队伍建设、教学实践建设、社会经费投入等方面的成效均有了显著提高;在城市维度上具有明显的异质性,非省会城市的“双高计划”高水平学校对师资队伍建设的提升效用更显著;对学生发展的显著正向影响缺乏持续性,对教学实践建设、社会经费投入方面的政策效应具有即时性且效果明显,对师资队伍建设水平政策效应具有滞后效应;对学校科研服务能力方面的影响虽为正向但不显著。基于此提出:应深入推进“双高计划”建设,引领职业教育服务国家战略;强化“双师”教师实践能力,提升“双师”队伍社会服务能力;深化“产城教”融合,发挥产业学院示范效应;明确“科教融汇”目标定位,创新科技成果转化机制。
Based on the panel data of 41“double-high plan”in Yangtze River Delta region from 2016 to 2022,the policy effect of the construction of high-level vocational colleges and universities under the“double-high plan”is evaluated by double-difference method.The results indicate that high-level schools under the“Double-High Plan”have significantly improved in student development,faculty team construction,teaching practice,and social funding inputs.There is notable heterogeneity at the urban level,with high-level schools under the“double-high plan”in non-provincial capital cities showing a more significant enhancement in faculty team construction.The significant positive impact on student development lacks sustainability,while the policy effects on teaching practice and social funding inputs are immediate and pronounced.Policy effects on faculty team construction exhibit lag effects.The impact on school research service capabilities,although positive,is not statistically significant.In addition,we should deepen the integration of“industry-cityeducation”and give full play to the demonstration effect of industrial colleges,clarify the goal and positioning of“science and education integration”,and innovate the mechanism of scientific and technological achievements transformation.
作者
奚康
吕洪霞
Xi Kang;Lv Hongxia(Zhejiang Business Technology Institute,Ningbo 315012;Zhuhai Institute of Jilin University)
出处
《职业技术教育》
北大核心
2024年第17期27-32,共6页
Vocational and Technical Education
基金
2024年度浙江省社科联研究课题“类型教育背景下双高计划促进人才培养质量的评价与机制研究”(2024B082)
2022年浙江省教育科学规划课题“职教集团模式下人才培养影响因素及优化机制研究”(2022SCG271)
浙江省高等教育学会2022年度高等教育研究重点课题“职业教育适应性背景下浙江省高职院校评价路径研究”(KT2022014),主持人:奚康。
关键词
长三角地区
“双高计划”
政策评估
双重差分法
Yangtze River Delta region
double-high plan
policy evaluation
the difference-in-difference method