中医学与印度阿育吠陀防治新型冠状病毒感染的研究主题及热点比较研究

Comparative Analysis of Research Themes and Hotspots in Traditional Chinese Medicine and Indian Ayurveda for COVID-19 Infection

目的:通过文献计量学方法分析并比较中医学与印度阿育吠陀防治新型冠状病毒(新冠病毒)感染的研究主题和热点,为中医药创新发展提供参考。方法:计算机检索Web of Science核心合集数据库,获得中医学及阿育吠陀防治新冠病毒感染研究文献,利用CiteSpace 6.2.R7可视化软件,采用引文分析、共现分析及聚类分析等文献计量学分析方法,分析并对比2020-2023年新冠病毒感染中医学与阿育吠陀研究论文的分布情况及研究热点。结果:中医药防治新冠病毒感染研究相较于阿育吠陀相关研究发文数量更多(1177/259)、参与国家更多(74/31)、参与机构更广(610/327)。中医药防治新冠病毒感染研究主题涉及网络药理学、系统综述、血必净注射液、荟萃分析、人参皂苷、模拟研究、网络分子对接等,研究热点包括网络药理学、分子对接、植物药、系统评价、抗病毒、急性肺损伤、天然产物等。阿育吠陀防治新冠病毒感染研究主题涉及腺苷-磷酸、病毒感受态、阿育吠陀-64、植物提取物、药代动力学、瑜伽等,研究热点包括提取物、分子对接、睡茄、心叶青牛胆、药用植物、抗病毒活性、水提取物、临床试验、免疫调节活性等。结论:中医学与阿育吠陀均基于各自固有优势开展新冠病毒感染相关研究,研究重点均在防治而非诊断上。相较于阿育吠陀,中医学更擅长引进与吸收新技术方法以筛选具有活性成分的中药,且关注患者的免疫调节。阿育吠陀似乎更重视利用传统方法对患心理健康及创伤后应激的干预。

Objective:To analyze and compare the research themes and hotspots of COVID-19 infection in traditional Chinese medicine and Indian Ayurveda through bibliometric methods,to provide references for the themes and hotspots of traditional Chinese medicine.Methods:The Web of Science core collection database was searched to obtain COVID-19 infection in traditional Chinese medicine and Ayurveda research literature,CiteSpace 6.2.R7 visualization software was used.using citation analysis,co-occurrence analysis cluster analysis,and other bibliometric analysis methods.Analyze and compare the distribution and research hotspots of TCM and Ayurvedic research papers on COVID-19 infection from 2020 to 2023.Results:Compared with the Ayurvedic research on COVID-19 infection,more research(1177/259),more participating countries(74/31),and more participating institutions(610/327)were found.The research topics of traditional Chinese medicine involve network pharmacology,systematic review,Xuebijing injection,meta-analysis,ginsenosides,in silico study,molecular docking etc.Research hotspots include network pharmacology,molecular docking,herbal medicine,systematic review,antiviral,acute lung injury,natural product,etc.Ayurvedic research topics involve AMP exception,virus competence,ayush-64,plant extract,pharmacokinetics,yoga,etc.The research hotspots include extract,molecular docking,withania somnifera,tinospora cordifolia,medicinal plant,antiviral activity,aqueous extract,clinical trial,immunomodulatory activity,etc.Conclusion:Both traditional Chinese medicine and Ayurveda have carried out relevant research on new COVID-19 infections based on their inherent advantages and characteristics,and their research focuses on prevention and treatment rather than diagnosis.Compared with Ayurveda,traditional Chinese medicine is good at absorbing and using new technologies and methods to screen traditional Chinese medicines with active ingredients,while paying attention to the immune regulation of patients.Ayurveda seems to pay more attention to the intervention of mental health and post-traumatic stress by using traditional methods.