期刊文献+

地方医学院校教师教学绩效评价指标体系初步构建研究

A preliminary study on the construction of the evaluation index system of teachers'teaching performance in local medical schools
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:初步构建教师教学绩效评价指标体系,为地方医学院校的教学绩效管理工作提供理论参考依据。方法:⑴通过文献分析,初步拟定教师教学绩效评价的相关指标体系框架;⑵采用德尔菲法选取符合函询要求的专家进行函询,对评价指标进行评分和筛选,整理后形成地方医学院校教师教学绩效评价指标体系;⑶采用层次分析法确定各指标的权重系数,并进行一致性检验。结果:两轮函询问卷回收率分别为91.4%、100.0%,专家的权威程度分别为0.847、0.844;肯德尔协调系数分别为0.178、0.227(P<0.001)。通过对专家函询结果整理分析,形成了包括4个一级指标、13个二级指标、40个三级指标的教师教学绩效评价指标体系。一级指标中,教学能力与水平指标的权重系数最高,教学质量与成果指标的权重系数最低,判断矩阵的一致性检验指标Cr为0.081;二级指标中,素养水平指标组合权重系数最高,判断矩阵的一致性检验指标Cr为0.000~0.035;三级指标中,出卷改卷、教书育人指标的组合权重系数最高,判断矩阵的一致性检验值Cr为0.000~0.052,各指标条目权重分配符合统计学逻辑,均满足一致性要求(Cr<0.1)。结论:通过德尔菲法结合层次分析法构建的地方医学院校教师教学绩效评价指标体系科学合理,可较全面评价地方医学院校教师的教学情况,对地方医学院校的教学绩效管理工作有一定的参考意义。 Objective:To establish the evaluation index system of teachers'teaching performance preliminarily,and to provide theoretical reference for teaching performance management in local medical schools.Methods:⑴Literature research method:in the early stage of this study,the relevant index system framework of teacher teaching performance evaluation was preliminarily drawn up through literature analysis;⑵Delphi method:experts who met the requirements of letter inquiry were selected for consultation,the evaluation indicators were scored and screened,and the teaching performance evaluation index system of local medical schools teachers was established after sorting out;⑶Analytic hierarchy process:the analytic hierarchy process was used to determine the weight coefficient of each indicator and conduct consistency test.Results:The response rates for the two rounds of Delphi questionnaires were 91.4%and 100.0%,respectively,and the expert authority coefficients were 0.847 and 0.844,respectively.The Kendall's coefficient of concordance was 0.178 and 0.227(P<0.001),respectively.Through the analysis of the expert Delphi results,a teacher teaching performance evaluation index system was developed,consisting of 4 first-level indicators,13 second-level indicators,and 40 third-level indicators.Among the first-level indicators,the weight coefficient for the teaching ability and level indicator was the highest,while the weight coefficient for the teaching quality and outcomes indicator was the lowest,with a consistency ratio(Cr)of 0.081 for the judgment matrix.Among the second-level indicators,the comprehensive weight coefficient for the literacy level indicator was the highest,with a consistency ratio(Cr)ranging from 0.000 to 0.035 for the judgment matrix.Among the third-level indicators,the comprehensive weight coefficient for the examination paper preparation and grading,and teaching and educating indicators was the highest,with a consistency ratio(Cr)ranging from 0.000 to 0.052 for the judgment matrix.The weight distribution for each indicator met statistical logic and consistency requirements(Cr<0.1).Conclusion:The evaluation index system of teachers'teaching performance constructed by Delphi method combined with analytic hierarchy process is scientific and reasonable,which can comprehensively evaluate the teaching performance of teachers of local medical schools.It can provide certain reference for the teaching performance management of local medical schools.
作者 徐志磊 李娟 XU Zhi-ei;LI Juan(School of Public Health and Health Management,Gannan Medical University,Ganzhou,Jiangxi 341000)
出处 《赣南医学院学报》 2024年第7期746-753,760,共9页 JOURNAL OF GANNAN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY
基金 江西省高等学校教学改革研究省级课题(JXJG-21-13-2)。
关键词 教师 医学院校 教学绩效 评价指标体系 德尔菲法 层次分析法 Teacher,medical schools Teaching performance Evaluation index system Delphi method Analytic hierarchy process
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献89

  • 1于泽元,王开升.立德树人:师德的养成之道[J].教育研究,2021(3):149-159. 被引量:48
  • 2吴渭虹,陈欣怡,刘思文,郑玲.住院病人需求调查与分析[J].护理管理杂志,2004,4(11):14-17. 被引量:34
  • 3吴振利.论学生评价高校教师教学绩效的模糊策略[J].黑龙江高教研究,2006,24(3):41-43. 被引量:10
  • 4[1]Barzilai, J., "On the decomposition of value functions", Operations Research Letters,Vol. 22, pp159-170, 1998a.
  • 5[2]Barzilai, J., "Consistency measures for pairwise comparison matrices", Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, Vol. 7,pp1232-132, 1998b.
  • 6[3]Barzilai, J. and F. A. Lootsma, "Power relations and group aggregation in the multiplicative ahp and smart", Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, Vol. 6,pp155-165, 1997.
  • 7[4]Belton, V. and A. E. Gear, "On a short-coming of saaty's method of analytic hierarchies," Omega, Vol. 11, No. 3,pp228-230, 1983.
  • 8[5]Belton, V. and A. E. Gear, "The legitimacy of rank reversal - a comment", Omega, Vol.13, No. 3, pp143-144, 1985.
  • 9[6]Beynon, M. J., "An investigation of the role of scale values in the ds/ahp method of multi-criteria decision making", Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, Vol. 11,pp327-343, 2002.
  • 10[7]Blair, A., R. Nachtmann, J. Olson, and T.Saaty, "Forecasting foreign exchange rates:an expert judgment approach",Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Vol. 21,No. 6, pp363-369,1987.

共引文献407

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部