期刊文献+

北斗+Galileo多频单历元精密单点定位性能分析

Performance analysis of BDS+Galileo single-epoch multi-frequency precision point positioning
下载PDF
导出
摘要 精密单点定位(PPP)需数十分钟才能实现厘米级定位,充分利用多频多模观测数据可加速PPP收敛。本文基于大洋洲区域基准站数据,研究和分析了北斗+Galileo多频单历元精密单点定位性能。结果表明,多频观测值构建的超宽巷和宽巷模糊度对窄巷模糊度的固定有显著增益。相较于双频PPP整数解(PPP-AR),三频PPP-AR模糊度瞬时固定率由27.6%提升至69.2%,四频和五频则进一步提升至78.9%和76.9%。北斗+Galileo四频在东、北、天方向瞬时定位精度分别可达7.1、7.8、23.9 cm。 Precise point positioning(PPP)typically requires tens of minutes to achieve centimeter-level positioning accuracy.However,the full utilization of multi-frequency and multi-constellation observations can accelerate PPP convergence.This study analyzes the BDS+Galileo multi-frequency single-epoch PPP performance based on the data from Australian regional reference stations.The results indicate that the extra wide-lane(EWL)and wide-lane(WL)ambiguity based on multi-frequency observations can improve the resolution of narrow-lane(NL)ambiguities significantly.Compared to dual-frequency PPP with ambiguity resolution(PPP-AR),the instantaneous ambiguity fixing rate increases significantly from 27.6%to 69.2%for triple-frequency PPP-AR.And it further increases to 78.9%and 76.9%for quad-and five-frequency solutions.The instantaneous positioning accuracy in the east,north,and up directions for BDS+Galileo quad-frequency solution can achieve 7.1,7.8 and 23.9 cm,respectively.
作者 徐胜意 郭靖 赵齐乐 李圳 乔灵娜 XU Shengyi;GUO Jing;ZHAO Qile;LI Zhen;QIAO Lingna(GNSS Research Center,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430079,China;Piesat Information Technology Co.,Ltd.,Beijing 100000,China)
出处 《测绘通报》 CSCD 北大核心 2024年第7期6-11,94,共7页 Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping
基金 国家自然科学基金(42304032 41974035) 第四届中国科协青年人才托举工程(2018QNRC001)。
关键词 北斗 伽利略 多频多模 PPP-AR BDS Galileo multi-frequency and multi-constellation PPP-AR
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献27

  • 1李博峰,沈云中,周泽波.中长基线三频GNSS模糊度的快速算法[J].测绘学报,2009,38(4):296-301. 被引量:64
  • 2范建军,王飞雪.一种短基线GNSS的三频模糊度解算(TCAR)方法[J].测绘学报,2007,36(1):43-49. 被引量:35
  • 3Forssell B, Martin-Neira M, Harrisz R A. Carrier Phase Ambiguity Resolution in GNSS-2 [C]. Pro- ceedings of the ION GPS-97, Kansas City, MO, 1997.
  • 4Vollath U, Birnbach S, Landau H, et al. Analysis of Three-Carrier Ambiguity Resolution (TCAR) Technique for Precise Relative Positioning in GNSS- 2[C]. Global Navigation Satellite Systems, Europe-an Symposium, Belgium, 1998.
  • 5Hatch R, Jung J, Enge P, et al. Civilian GPS: the Benefits of Three Frequencies[J]. GPS Solutions, 2000, 3(4): 1-9.
  • 6Teunissen P, Joosten P, Tiberius C. A Comparison of TCAR, CIR and LAMBDA GNSS Ambiguity Resolution[C]. Proceeding of the 15th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the In- stitute of Navigation (ION GPS 2002), Portland, Oregon, USA, 2002.
  • 7Hatch R. A New Three-Frequency, Geometry-Free Technique for Ambiguity Resolution[C]. Proceed- ings of ION GNSS, Fort Worth, Texas, 2006.
  • 8Feng Y. GNSS Three Carrier Ambiguity Resolution Using Ionosphere-Reduced Virtual Signals [ J ]. Journal of Geodesy, 2008, 82(12) : 847-862.
  • 9Ma X, Shen Y. Multipath Analysis of COMPASS Triple Frequency Observations [C]. The Interna- tional Symposium on GPS/GNSS, Xi'an, China, 2012.
  • 10Coeard M, Bourgon S, Kamali O, et al. A System- atic Investigation of Optimal Carrier-Phase Combi- nations for Modernized Triple-Frequency GPS[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2008, 82(9) : 555-564.

共引文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部