论数字法院

On Digital Courts

作为数字中国总体战略的一部分,数字法院建设以“公正与效率”为核心命题,秉持数字赋能、数字正义和以人为本的数字法治理念,构成司法领域的重塑性变革。数字法院建设是在习近平法治思想指导下,司法为民理念与科技创新精神在数字中国战略实施中的有机结合。不同于传统的法院信息化建设、智慧法院建设,数字法院建设是法院工作从根本上实现高质量发展、迈入现代化的方法路径,其依托大数据手段建立覆盖审判执行各领域的数字场景模型,对内实现不间断的质量评查和风险预警,对外升级诉讼服务、参与社会治理,推动实现了法院工作理念、业务流程、组织架构和治理方式的再造。数字法院建设主要从数助办案、数助监督、数助便民、数助治理、数助政务五个方面展开,遵循“数据解构—模型构建—嵌入运行”的开发路径,自下而上地形成场景驱动的业务应用体系。无论数字法院建设到何种阶段,都必须遵循三项原则:坚持法官主体地位不变、加强司法数据的安全保障、确保模型算法可靠。

As a part of the Digital China strategy,the construction of digital courts takes"fairness and efficiency"as its core proposition.It upholds the concepts of the digital rule of law,including digital empowerment,digital justice,and the people-oriented rule of law,thereby making a transformative reform in the judicial system.The construction of digital courts is an organic combination of the idea of justice for the people and the spirit of scientific and technological innovation in the implementation of Digital China strategy under the guidance of Xi Jinping thought on the rule of law.Different from the informatization of traditional court and the construction of smart courts,the construction of digital courts serves as a pathway to achieving high-quality development and modernization of people's courts.Relying on big data to establish digital scenario models covering all areas of trial and enforcement,it can realize the reconstruction of judicial ideas,the litigation process,and the court organizational structure by facilitating the continuous quality assessment and risk warning internally and enhancing litigation services and engaging in social governance externally.The construction of digital courts is mainly carried out in five aspects,i.e.,digital case handling,digital supervision,digital convenience for the people,digital governance,and digital administration,and should follow the development path of"data deconstructionmodel constructionembedded operation",forming a scenario-driven application system from the bottom up.Regardless of the stage of digital court construction,three principles must be followed,that is,adhering to the authority of the judge,strengthening the security of judicial data,and ensuring the reliability of model algorithms.