期刊文献+

医保视角下新药创新性认定与价格管理政策的国际对比分析

International comparative analysis of innovation recognition and price management of new drugs from the perspective of national healthcare security
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的为我国创新药价格体系的完善提供参考。方法基于我国创新药医保管理现状,对比分析国际典型国家或地区创新药认定与价格管理政策,提出完善我国创新药价格体系的建议。结果与结论中国台湾地区、日本、澳大利亚、德国以及英国对于药品创新性认定与分级、区分定价以及后续价格管理3个环节做法不同,但整体而言,都是主要依据药品的临床价值进行创新性认定和分级,依据分级进行差异化定价,并采用风险分担协议或主动价格调整进行价格管理。基于国内外政策对比,建议我国在创新药管理中进一步明晰创新的内涵与分级,应用多种定价方式促进创新分级管理,探索引入风险分担协议,并进一步构建主动药价调整机制,以完善我国创新药价格体系。 OBJECTIVE To provide reference for the improvement of the price system of innovative drugs in China.METHODS Based on the current situation of innovative drug healthcare management in China,innovation recognition and price management of innovative drugs in typical countries or regions were compared and analyzed,and the suggestions were put forward to improve the price system of innovative drugs in China.RESULTS&CONCLUSIONS Taiwan of China,Japan,Australia,Germany and the United Kingdom have different practices in recognition and grading of drug innovation,differentiated pricing and subsequent price management.However,the mainstream practice is to identify and grade drugs mostly based on clinical value,differentiate pricing based on the grading,and carry out risk-sharing agreement or active price adjustment to manage the price.Based on the comparative analysis,it is suggested that China should further clarify the connotation and classification of innovation in the management of innovative drugs,apply a variety of pricing methods to promote differentiated management of innovative drugs,explore the introduction of risk-sharing agreements,and further build an active drug price adjustment mechanism to improve the price system of innovative drugs in China.
作者 毛凯峰 虞杰 王琳宁 路云 常峰 MAO Kaifeng;YU Jie;WANG Linning;LU Yun;CHANG Feng(School of International Pharmaceutical Business,China Pharmaceutical University,Nanjing 211198,China)
出处 《中国药房》 CAS 北大核心 2024年第15期1801-1806,共6页 China Pharmacy
基金 国家医疗保障局课题(No.7422000079)。
关键词 创新药 创新性认定 差异化定价 分级管理 价格管理 动态调整 风险分担 innovative drug innovation recognition differentiated pricing level-to-level administration drug price management dynamic adjustment risk sharing
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献68

  • 1董文勇.德国社会医疗保险用药费用控制制度及其对中国的启示[J].环球法律评论,2006,28(2):208-217. 被引量:24
  • 2智春,王义,朱小宛.澳大利亚、新西兰公共卫生监督管理及对我们的启示[J].中国卫生事业管理,2007,23(7):493-495. 被引量:3
  • 3何建志.全民健康保险价量协议法律问题分析[J].台大法学论丛,2014,43(2):381-417.
  • 4de Pouvourville G. Risk-sharing agreements for innovative drugs[J]. The European Journal of Health E- conomics, 2006, 7(3): 155-157.
  • 5Ethgen O. Risk-sharing: The Need to Think Differently [EB/OL]. http://www.ispor.org/news/articles/ May -June2011/Risk -sharing -The -Need -to -Think - Differently.asp, 2011.
  • 6Adamski J, Godman B, et al. Risk sharing ar- rangements for pharmaceuticals: potential considera- tions and recommendations for European payers [J]. BMC health services research, 2010, 10(1): 153.
  • 7Towse A, Garrison Jr L P. Can't get no satis- faction? Will pay for performance help? [J]. Pharma- coeconomics, 2010, 28(2): 93-102.
  • 8Klemp M, Frznsdal K B, Facey K. What princi- ples should govern the use of managed entry agree- ments? [J]. International journal of technology assess- merit in health care, 2011, 27(1): 77-83.
  • 9Carlson J J, Sullivan S D, Garrison L P, et al. Linking payment to health outcomes: a taxonomy and examination of performance-based reimbursement schemes between heahhcare payers and manufacturers [J]. Health policy, 2010, 96(3): 179-190.
  • 10Garrison L P, Towse A, Briggs A, et al. Perfor- mance-based risk-sharing arrangements--good prac- tices for design, implementation, and evaluation: report of the ISPOR good practices for performance-based risk-sharing arrangements task force [J]. Value in Health, 2013, 16(5): 703-719.

共引文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部