期刊文献+

民航飞行员冒险倾向性人格量表的编制

Development of the Pilot's Risk-Taking Personality Scale
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:编制适合我国民航飞行员的冒险倾向人格量表(RTPS),并检验其信效度。方法:通过文献分析和半结构式访谈构建理论结构和指标体系,编制初始量表。对试测的432名民航飞行员问卷数据进行统计分析,因子分析验证理论模型并确定RTPS正式量表。结果:RTPS共18个项目,包括(驾驶)感觉寻求、愤怒和敌意、攻击性、开放性4个因子,累计解释方差的62.36%。验证性因子分析表明,双因子结构更能解释问卷结构(χ^(2)/df=1.52,RMSEA=0.05,SRMR=0.05,TLI=0.96,CFI=0.97,IFI=0.94)。整体量表的Conbach’α系数为0.89。校标关联效度分析显示,飞行员冒险倾向与风险容忍呈显著正相关。结论:民航飞行员冒险倾向人格量表信效度良好,为识别、预测和评估飞行员的冒险倾向提供了可靠的测量工具。 Objective:To develop the Risk-Taking Personality Scale(RTPS)for Chinese pilots and test its reliability and validity.Methods:The theoretical structure and indicator system were determined through literature analysis and semi-structured interviews.The initial version of RTPS was formed.Statistical analysis was conducted on the questionnaire data of 432 civil aviation pilots,factor analysis was used to validate the theoretical model,and the official RTPS scale was determined.Results:PRTS contained 18 items,including four factors:(driving)sensation seeking,anger and hostility,aggression,and openness,which accounted for 62.36%variance.Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the two-factor structure better explained the questionnaire structure(χ^(2)/df=1.52,RMSEA=0.05,SRMR=0.05,TLI=0.96,CFI=0.97,IFI=0.94).Conbach’αof the scale was 0.89.The criterion-related validity analysis showed that there was a significant positive correlation between RTPS and PRTS.Conclusion:The Risk-Taking Personality Scale has a fine reliability and validity,which provides a reliable measurement tool for identifying,predicting and evaluating pilots'risk-taking tendency.
作者 汪磊 线媛媛 高杉 WANG Lei;XIAN Yuanyuan;GAO Shan(College of Safety Science and Engineering,Civil Aviation University of China,Tianjin 300300,China)
出处 《中国健康心理学杂志》 2024年第8期1232-1239,共8页 China Journal of Health Psychology
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(编号:32071063) 中央高校基本科研业务费项目(编号3122024026)。
关键词 飞行员冒险倾向 量表编制 因子分析 信效度 Pilots'risk-taking tendency Scale development Factor analysis Reliability and validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献71

  • 1罗晓利.近12年中国民航人因事故与事故征候的分类研究(英文)[J].航天医学与医学工程,2004,17(5):318-321. 被引量:5
  • 2马成功,王二平,林平.基于行为的绩效评定方法的研究进展[J].心理科学进展,2002,10(4):453-459. 被引量:31
  • 3游旭群,李瑛,石学云,金兰军.航线飞行安全文化特征评价方法的因素分析研究[J].心理科学,2005,28(4):837-840. 被引量:11
  • 4戴春林,吴明证,杨治良.个体攻击性结构与自尊关系研究[J].心理科学,2006,29(1):44-46. 被引量:41
  • 5Amalberti, R. (1993). Safety in flight. In: Wilpert B, Qvale T U. Reliability and Safety in Hazardous Work System. U K, Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 171-194.
  • 6Beneigh, T., & Hubbard, T. P. (2007). CRM Vectors 2007. International Journal of Professional Aviation Training & Testing Research, 1 (1): 29-37.
  • 7Boeing Commercial Airplane Group. (1998). Statistical summary of commercial jet airplane accidents. Worldwide operations 1959-1997 (pp. 74-81 ). Seattle, Washington.
  • 8中国民用航空总局.(2007).一般运行和飞行规则(CCAR-91-R1).北京:中国民用航空总局.
  • 9Federal Aviation Administration. (2006). Line operations safety audits. Advisory Circular 120-90, Washington DC: Author.
  • 10Flin, R., Goeters, K. M., Martin, L., & Hormann, H. J. (1998a) A generic structure of non-technical skills for training and assessment. Paper presented at the 23^rd Conference of European Association for Aviation Psychology, Vienna, Australia.

共引文献209

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部